JANARDHAN GRANDHE MD A MEDICAL CORPORATION
NPI 1003058637, organization, Bakersfield, CA, Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since October 14, 2022.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 17 later months, $268,801 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Oct 14, 2022 | Oct 14, 2032 | 17 | Nov 2022 | Mar 2024 | $269K | $1.2M |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | JANARDHAN GRANDHE MD A MEDICAL CORPORATION (also CENTRAL VALLEY PAIN MANAGEMENT) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | March 27, 2009, last updated October 25, 2023 |
| Practice location | 6401 TRUXTUN AVE, SUITE B, Bakersfield, CA 93309-0613, 661-327-9300 |
| Authorized official | SUNDEEP GRANDHE (President) |
| Specialties | Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine (207LP2900X, primary, license A52798 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A4595 | Medicaid service code | $1.2M | 41% | $16 | $20 (top 5% from $62) | 21st percentile | |
| 27096 | Injection of anesthetic or steroid into joint between lower spine and hip bone using imaging guidance | $556K | 18% | $137 | $122 (top 5% from $510) | 48th percentile | |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $213K | 7% | $16 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 10th percentile | |
| E0730 | Medicaid service code | $141K | 5% | $51 | $66 (top 5% from $236) | 40th percentile | |
| 64483 | Injection of anesthetic and/or steroid drug into sacral spine nerve root using imaging guidance, single level | $121K | 4% | $75 | $150 (top 5% from $603) | 5th percentile | |
| 64484 | Injection of anesthetic and/or steroid drug into sacral spine nerve root using imaging guidance, each additional level | $84K | 3% | $54 | $59 (top 5% from $193) | 25th percentile | |
| 20552 | Injection of trigger points, 1-2 muscles | $80K | 3% | $11 | $28 (top 5% from $150) | 9th percentile | |
| 64493 | Injection of lower or sacral spine facet joint using imaging guidance, single level | $65K | 2% | $45 | $125 (top 5% from $689) | 6th percentile |
In this area
150 providers in Kern County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $131.3M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 132 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 17. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANARDHAN GRANDHE Bakersfield, CA, ranked 117 | $174K |
|
| 2 | JANELE SHAFER Bakersfield, CA, ranked 737 | $488K |
|
| 2 | SAMANTHA ESSENBERG Bakersfield, CA, ranked 741 | $386K |
|
| 2 | NAVNEET KAUR Bakersfield, CA, ranked 743 | $325K |
|
| 2 | RIPON DEEP KAUR Bakersfield, CA, ranked 747 | $235K |
|
| 3 | D A HEALTH CARE SERVICES Bakersfield, CA, ranked 807 | $243K |
|
| 3 | KERN HOSPICE CARE, INC Bakersfield, CA, ranked 1021 | $1.3M |
|
| 3 | WESTERN HEALTH RESOURCES Bakersfield, CA, ranked 1147 | $502K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.