Providers
All 214 in CA
BRISTOL HOSPICE - INLAND VALLEY, L.L.C.
NPI 1013318112, organization, Ontario, CA, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00038, ranked 38 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 5389, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00038 ranked 3847 providers around Glendale, CA: 16 hospices, 30 home health agencies, 1 nursing facility.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | BRISTOL HOSPICE - INLAND VALLEY, L.L.C. |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | September 8, 2014, last updated February 23, 2026 |
| Practice location | 1520 N MOUNTAIN AVE STE 206, Ontario, CA 91762-1133, 909-256-3245 |
| Mailing address | 206 N 2100 W STE 202, Salt Lake City, UT 84116-4741 |
| Authorized official | ALEX MAURICIO (President and CEO) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
214 providers in San Bernardino County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $174.5M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 110 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 98. 3 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAGALY VELASQUEZ Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 18 | $60K |
|
| 1 | MAGALY M VELASQUEZ DDS PROFESSIONAL DENTAL CORP Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 174 | $60K |
|
| 1 | PAUL STANTON Apple Valley, CA, ranked 358 | $2K |
|
| 3 | CALSTRO HOSPICE INC. Montclair, CA, ranked 949 | $2.8M |
|
| 3 | FLOWER HOME HEALTH INC. Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 1002 | $1.5M |
|
| 3 | SUNCREST HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Chino, CA, ranked 1066 | $866K |
|
| 3 | ACES HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC Montclair, CA, ranked 1142 | $518K |
|
| 3 | VANURA HOMEHEALTH SERVICES, INC. Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 1154 | $482K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.