Providers
SUPPORTIVE CARE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE LLC
NPI 1013657618, organization, Derry, NH, Psychologist, Clinical
5
Evidence tier
informational
score 28 of 100, rank 11970, $2K at stake
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| doj admin enforcement record (civil settlement): behavioral health companies, ceo, pay nearly $4.6 million to settle allegations related to telehealth services for nursing home residents | No NPI on the list; matched by name at high confidence | Jun 13, 2024 | still open | 5 | Jul 2024 | Nov 2024 | $2K | $1000 |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SUPPORTIVE CARE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE LLC |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | March 31, 2022, last updated March 31, 2022 |
| Practice location | 20 CHESTER RD, Derry, NH 03038-1636, 718-298-4375 |
| Mailing address | 27 RANDOLPH RD, Howell, NJ 07731-8611 |
| Authorized official | RAPHAEL LICHTSCHEIN (President) |
| Specialties | Psychologist, Clinical (103TC0700X, primary) |
In this area
3 providers in Rockingham County, NH carry an indicator in the public record, with $10.9M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 2 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 1.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | J & K STAFFING SOLUTIONS, LLC Salem, NH, ranked 761 | $10.5M |
|
| 3 | TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME, INC. North Hampton, NH, ranked 5589 | $0 |
|
| 4 | LISA MITCHELL Hampton Falls, NH, ranked 9291 | $383K |
|
Recent enforcement in NH
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedJun 25, 2026
The District of New Hampshire and the New England Strike Force Charges Money Laundering Operation Tied to Nearly $3 Billion Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
Two alleged associates of a Transnational Criminal Organization were charged with conspiring to commit money laundering of proceeds from a nationwide scheme in which nearly $3 billion in fraudulent claims for durable medical equipment were submitted to Medicare using stolen identities of patients and doctors, with proceeds funneled through nominee-owned bank accounts to shell companies and overseas banks.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Four Charged in New Hampshire as Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Four defendants were charged in New Hampshire with fraudulent Medicare claims for durable medical equipment, money laundering of health care fraud proceeds, theft of a U.S. citizen's identity to obtain Medicare and Medicaid benefits, and a pharmacist's diversion of controlled substances.
DOJSentencedJan 28, 2026
Repeat Health Care Fraud Offender Sentenced for Defrauding New Hampshire Medicaid
Alonso, while on the HHS-OIG Exclusion List, provided psychotherapy services billed to New Hampshire Medicaid and caused claims to be submitted for counseling services not provided as represented, causing approximately $173,998 in payments.
DOJCivil settlementDec 10, 2025
Telehealth Company Agrees to Pay $300,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
LifeWorks Counseling Associates and its owner submitted claims and received reimbursement from Medicaid for services provided by Erik Alonso, who was excluded from federal health care programs at the time.
DOJPleaded guiltyOct 23, 2025
Repeat Offender Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud Scheme in New Hampshire
Alonso, an excluded psychotherapist, worked for a New Hampshire telehealth mental health provider and caused claims to be submitted to New Hampshire Medicaid for services he was barred from billing and for counseling services that were not provided as represented, causing payments of approximately $173,998.83.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.