Providers
ROMEL IZQUIERDO-MALON, M.D.
NPI 1033422357, individual, Saint Charles, MO, Internal Medicine
1
Evidence tier
adjudicated in a public enforcement record
- Adjudicated (pleaded guilty) per a Department of Justice release dated January 31, 2024.
- Medicaid paid $4,022 in the last 12 observed months.
score 94 of 100, rank 335, $4K at stake
Public list actions
Medicare revocation effective January 31, 2024, barred from re-enrolling until January 31, 2034
424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(12) other program termination (medicaid) and 424.535(a)(3) felonies and 424.535(a)(2) provider or supplier conduct (exclusion), Practitioner - Internal Medicine, MO
OIG exclusion November 20, 2024 under section 1128a1
Physician (MD, DO), Internal Medicine, Marion, IL
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ROMEL IZQUIERDO-MALON, M.D. (also ROMEL IZQUIERDO MERA) |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 15, 2010, last updated June 24, 2022 |
| Practice location | 300 1ST CAPITOL DR, Saint Charles, MO 63301-2844, 314-317-0600 |
| Mailing address | 12101 WOODCREST EXECUTIVE DR, SUITE 210, Saint Louis, MO 63141-5047 |
| Specialties | Hospitalist (208M00000X, license 2013018159 MO) Internal Medicine (207R00000X, primary, license 2013018159 MO) |
In this area
5 providers in St. Charles County, MO carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.3M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 3 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INSPIRING ANGELS LLC Saint Charles, MO, ranked 463 | $0 |
|
| 3 | SSM HEALTH BUSINESSES Wentzville, MO, ranked 3003 | $0 |
|
| 3 | ST CHARLES OPCO LLC Saint Charles, MO, ranked 5692 | $0 |
|
| 3 | NHC HEALTHCARE-ST. CHARLES LLC Saint Charles, MO, ranked 6598 | $0 |
|
| 5 | SRINIVAS BATTULA Saint Peters, MO, ranked 10057 | $1.3M |
|
Recent enforcement in MO
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Kansas Chiropractor Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud
Laser submitted claims to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City seeking payment for chiropractic services purportedly rendered on dates when patients had not visited Laser Chiropractic and received no treatment, including billing using the information of an individual who never received treatment.
DOJIndictedJul 30, 2026
Adult Day Care Provider Accused of $1.47 Million Missouri Medicaid Fraud
King submitted $1.47 million in false claims to Missouri Medicaid through Agape Love Adult Day Care LLC for services never provided, claiming 10 hours of care per day when only half that was provided and billing for patients who were absent or hospitalized.
DOJSentencedJul 21, 2026
Home Health Care Operator Sentenced for Defrauding Missouri Medicaid
Childress submitted fraudulent enrollment documents concealing her ownership of a home health care company and then billed Missouri Medicaid for home health services that were never provided.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
Federal Health Care Fraud Takedown Targets 455 Defendants and $6.5 Billion in False Claims
Four defendants were charged by complaint in the Western District of Missouri with forgery and using fraudulent nursing credentials or with false statements to receive health care payments and stealing by deceit for Medicaid claims for personal care services that were not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 3, 2026
U.S. Attorney’s Office Seeks Potential Victims in Case Against Columbia, Missouri Doctor
A federal grand jury charged Morris with issuing controlled substance prescriptions outside the usual course of professional practice and with defrauding Medicare and Missouri Medicaid by billing for services falsely representing him as the rendering provider when services were rendered by assistant physicians and by submitting claims for prescriptions not eligible for reimbursement.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.