Providers

KINGS HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTER LP

NPI 1083212716, organization, Hanford, CA, Skilled Nursing Facility

Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameKINGS HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTER LP
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedOctober 14, 2020, last updated June 29, 2026
Practice location851 LESLIE LN, Hanford, CA 93230-5643, 559-582-4414
Mailing address3580 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 600, Los Angeles, CA 90010-2502
Authorized officialShlomo Rechnitz (Manager)
Specialties
Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary)

In this area

5 providers in Kings County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $401K at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 3 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 2.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3WESTERN HEALTH RESOURCES
Hanford, CA, ranked 1255
$251K
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
3WESTERN HEALTH RESOURCES
Hanford, CA, ranked 1907
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
4DAPHINE KANIARU
Lemoore, CA, ranked 9763
$3K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 3104 patients a month across 4 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4XIN LING LAO
Hanford, CA, ranked 9773
$873
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 973 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
5ELTON TRIPP
Hanford, CA, ranked 11541
$146K

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.