Providers
PLEASANT VIEW HOME
NPI 1235162181, organization, Inman, KS, Home Health
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00085, ranked 85 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6412, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00085 ranked 8552 providers around Overland Park, KS: 10 hospices, 12 home health agencies, 30 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | PLEASANT VIEW HOME (also PLEASANT VIEW HOME CARE HOME HEALTH AGENCY) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 7, 2006, last updated December 18, 2015 |
| Practice location | 108 N WALNUT ST, Inman, KS 67546-8016, 620-585-6411 |
| Mailing address | PO BOX 249, Inman, KS 67546-0249 |
| Authorized official | Kevin Reimer (C.e.o.) |
| Specialties | Home Health (251E00000X, license A-059-012 KS) Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license A-059-017 KS) |
In this area
2 providers in McPherson County, KS carry an indicator in the public record, with $91K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 2 of them.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | COMMUNITY CARE HOSPICE LLC Mcpherson, KS, ranked 1366 | $91K |
|
| 3 | PLEASANT VIEW HOME Inman, KS, ranked 3765 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in KS
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyFeb 20, 2025
Vice President of Health Care Software and Services Company Pleads Guilty to $1B Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
Schreck and co-conspirators owned and operated DMERx, an internet-based platform that generated false doctors' orders for orthotic braces, pain creams, and other items, connecting pharmacies, DME suppliers, and marketers with telemedicine companies that accepted kickbacks for signed orders, resulting in more than $1 billion in billings.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.