Providers
All 206 in TX
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
NPI 1285022673, organization, Lancaster, TX, Skilled Nursing Facility
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00191 ranked 191218 providers around San Antonio, TX: 21 hospices, 11 home health agencies, 186 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT (also WINDSOR GARDENS) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | January 7, 2015, last updated August 28, 2025 |
| Practice location | 2535 W PLEASANT RUN RD, Lancaster, TX 75146-1111, 972-228-8029 |
| Mailing address | 5201 HARRY HINES BLVD, Dallas, TX 75235-7708 |
| Authorized official | Edmundo Castaneda (Ceo) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary) |
In this area
206 providers in Dallas County, TX carry an indicator in the public record, with $106.3M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 177 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 15. 7 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAZING GRACE FAMILY DENTISTRY, PC Dallas, TX, ranked 178 | $57K |
|
| 1 | CECILE NGUYEN Grand Prairie, TX, ranked 187 | $52K |
|
| 1 | PHR DIAGNOSTICS, LLC Dallas, TX, ranked 431 | $226 |
|
| 1 | DENO BARROGA Dallas, TX, ranked 465 | $0 |
|
| 1 | DESI BARROGA Dallas, TX, ranked 491 | $0 |
|
| 1 | AXIS PROFESSIONAL LABS LLC Farmers Branch, TX, ranked 613 | $0 |
|
| 1 | KINGDOM HEALTH LABORATORY LLC Dallas, TX, ranked 678 | $0 |
|
| 3 | COMFORT HOME HEALTH CARE INC Garland, TX, ranked 818 | $8.9M |
|
Recent enforcement in TX
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
Dallas medical clinic to pay $7.5 million to resolve COVID-19 testing overbilling allegations
Aymancare billed the federal government's HRSA Uninsured Program for separate evaluation and management services in addition to COVID-19 specimen collection and testing at pop-up testing sites when no such separate services were performed.
DOJConvictedAug 12, 2026
Scammer pharmacist guilty in $20 million healthcare kickback scheme
Thomas paid over $2 million in kickbacks to the owner of a Houston clinic in exchange for referrals of DOL-OWCP insured patients prescribed high-reimbursement compounded medications, which his pharmacy then billed to DOL-OWCP, receiving more than $20 million in reimbursements.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
U.S. Attorney Announces Major Health Care Fraud Cases in Western District of Texas
Charles is alleged to have received illegal kickbacks for referring patients to San Antonio area hospice companies, causing over $9 million in Medicare claims, while Dr. Duncan settled allegations of billing Medicare and TRICARE for an unapproved amniotic-based product and Trevor's Place settled allegations of submitting inflated TRICARE claims for services not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Nine charged in SDTX as part of national health care fraud takedown
Nine defendants were indicted in the Southern District of Texas for operating pill mill clinics and a pharmacy that unlawfully distributed controlled substances, billing Medicaid $16 million for mental health services for minors that did not occur, and billing Medicare and TRICARE approximately $906 million for medically unnecessary amniotic wound allografts procured through kickbacks.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Northern District of Texas Charges 13 Health Care Fraudsters for Loss Over $360 Million
Thirteen defendants in the Northern District of Texas were charged in seven cases involving more than $365 million in fraudulent billing to federally-funded programs and other insurers, including laboratory and genetic testing claims procured through kickbacks, transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments billed to TRICARE, medically unnecessary EEG testing, and hospice services never provided.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.