Providers
All 16 in FL
PINELLAS EYE CARE PA
NPI 1306165493, organization, St Petersburg, FL, Ophthalmology
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | PINELLAS EYE CARE PA (also GULFCOAST EYE CARE) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | May 27, 2010, last updated July 23, 2024 |
| Practice location | 1515 9TH AVE N, St Petersburg, FL 33705-1224, 727-895-2020 |
| Authorized official | MICHAEL MANNING (Medical Director) |
| Specialties | Optometrist (152W00000X) Optometrist, Corneal and Contact Management (152WC0802X) Optometrist, Pediatrics (152WP0200X) Ophthalmology (207W00000X, primary, license ME99008 FL) Ophthalmology, Retina Specialist (207WX0107X) Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (207WX0200X) Psychiatry & Neurology, Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology (2084N0402X) Non-Pharmacy Dispensing Site (332900000X) Durable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies (332B00000X) |
In this area
16 providers in St Petersburg, FL carry an indicator in the public record, with $11.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 12 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 4.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | PROHEALTH HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 2625 | $0 |
|
| 3 | ALBORADA HOME HEALTH OF TAMPA, INC ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 3779 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CPLACE OF ST. PETE, LLC ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 4754 | $0 |
|
| 3 | LAURELLWOOD FL OPCO LLC ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 7214 | $0 |
|
| 4 | HAZEM AL-ANDARY ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 8726 | $2.0M |
|
| 4 | ERIN GARRIGAN ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 8863 | $1.4M |
|
| 4 | THIEN TRANG TRAN ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 8926 | $1.2M |
|
| 4 | LUIS YCAZA ST Petersburg, FL, ranked 9157 | $579K |
|
Recent enforcement in FL
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 14, 2026
Ocala Mental Health Counselor Pleads Guilty to Aggravated Identity Theft and Wire Fraud
Forsythe used the names and insurance policy information of 22 individuals without their consent to bill two health insurance companies for counseling services she had not provided.
DOJConvictedAug 12, 2026
Cuban National Convicted of Unlawfully Obtaining US Citizenship After Concealing Healthcare Fraud Scheme
Rodriguez concealed on her naturalization application her participation in a seven-year healthcare fraud conspiracy that resulted in approximately $4.6 million in fraudulent healthcare claims.
DOJCivil settlementAug 3, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Complete Health to Pay $14,100,000 to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Complete Health caused the submission of diagnosis codes within HCC 55 and HCC 59 that were not clinically valid, not supported by medical records, and/or not considered in the beneficiary's care, increasing Medicare Advantage risk-adjusted payments from which it received a percentage.
DOJCivil settlementJul 31, 2026
Two Additional Ophthalmology Practices Agree to Pay $2.3M to Resolve Allegations of Fraudulent Claims to Medicare and Medicaid for Cranial Ultrasounds
Two ophthalmology practices billed Medicare and Medicaid for medically unnecessary trans-cranial doppler ultrasounds premised on false diagnoses, with one practice receiving remuneration from a third-party testing company to refer patients for the tests.
DOJCivil settlementJul 31, 2026
Two Additional Ophthalmology Practices Agree to Pay $2.3M to Resolve Allegations of Fraudulent Claims to Medicare and Medicaid for Cranial Ultrasounds
Two ophthalmology practices billed Medicare and Medicaid for medically unnecessary trans-cranial doppler ultrasounds premised on false diagnoses and, as to Floral Park Ophthalmology, resulting from remuneration paid by a third-party testing company to induce referrals.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.