MARIA VALDEZ
NPI 1306296405, individual, Roma, TX, Clinic/Center, Adult Day Care
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | MARIA VALDEZ (also BELLA ESPERANZA ADULT DAYCARE) |
| Type | Individual, sole proprietor |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 20, 2016, last updated June 13, 2024 |
| Practice location | 5145 OLD ESCOBARES HIGHWAY 83, Roma, TX 78584-5824, 956-298-0043 |
| Specialties | Clinic/Center, Adult Day Care (261QA0600X, license 147543 TX) Clinic/Center, Adult Day Care (261QA0600X, primary) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S5101 | Adult day care per half day | $1.6M | 100% | $618 | $439 (top 5% from $826) | 79th percentile |
In this area
5 providers in Starr County, TX carry an indicator in the public record, with $3.3M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 4 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CELIA ZUNIGA Rio Grande City, TX, ranked 249 | $19K |
|
| 4 | DARIA BABINEAUX Rio Grande City, TX, ranked 8798 | $1.7M |
|
| 4 | ARTEMIO GARCIA Rio Grande City, TX, ranked 9393 | $269K |
|
| 5 | MARIO RODRIGUEZ Rio Grande City, TX, ranked 10059 | $1.3M |
|
| 5 | YVETTE BELTRAN DBA LOS GIRASOLES ADULT DAY Rio Grande City, TX, ranked 11838 | $28K |
Recent enforcement in TX
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.