Providers
All 65 in CA
ACCENTCARE HOME HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
NPI 1316947864, organization, Sacramento, CA, Home Health
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00205 ranked 205161 providers around Sugar Land, TX: 57 hospices, 102 home health agencies, 2 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ACCENTCARE HOME HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (also ACCENTCARE HOME HEALTH OF SACRAMENTO, INC.) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 27, 2005, last updated October 25, 2024 |
| Practice location | 2295 GATEWAY OAKS DR STE 125, Sacramento, CA 95833-4259, 916-852-5888 |
| Mailing address | 17855 DALLAS PKWY STE 200, Dallas, TX 75287-6857 |
| Authorized official | Dena Schwartz-Doty (Svp) |
| Specialties | Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license 100000471 CA) |
In this area
65 providers in Sacramento County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $37.7M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 40 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 25.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | AMERICAN RIVER HOME CARE Sacramento, CA, ranked 792 | $797K |
|
| 3 | SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE Sacramento, CA, ranked 802 | $431K |
|
| 3 | ACEPTIO HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. Orangevale, CA, ranked 979 | $1.9M |
|
| 3 | PROHEALTH HOME CARE, INC Sacramento, CA, ranked 1062 | $876K |
|
| 3 | PRESTIGE HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Elk Grove, CA, ranked 1140 | $520K |
|
| 3 | RX STAFFING AND HOME CARE, INC Sacramento, CA, ranked 1440 | $42K |
|
| 3 | A PLUS HEALTHCARE, LLC Fair Oaks, CA, ranked 1505 | $17K |
|
| 3 | RANCHO SECO CARE CENTER LLC Galt, CA, ranked 1916 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.