Providers
All 48 in CA
SEASONS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC
NPI 1326382755, organization, San Jose, CA, Hospice Care, Community Based
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00205 ranked 205161 providers around Sugar Land, TX: 57 hospices, 102 home health agencies, 2 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SEASONS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC (also ACCENTCARE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | November 26, 2012, last updated May 2, 2024 |
| Practice location | 400 RACE ST, STE 101, San Jose, CA 95126-3518, 800-570-8809 |
| Mailing address | 6400 SHAFER CT, STE 700, Rosemont, IL 60018-4914 |
| Authorized official | Heather Siscel (VP Legal) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
48 providers in Santa Clara County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $42.6M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 24 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 21. 2 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JUAN E POSADA MD INCORPORATED San Jose, CA, ranked 371 | $2K |
|
| 1 | BRENDA VILLASENOR East Palo Alto, CA, ranked 385 | $1K |
|
| 3 | PROHEALTH HOME CARE, INC. San Jose, CA, ranked 1317 | $137K |
|
| 3 | SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE Saratoga, CA, ranked 1464 | $30K |
|
| 3 | COMFORT HANDS HEALTHCARE INC San Jose, CA, ranked 1568 | $7K |
|
| 3 | GOLD STAR HOSPICE LLC Sunnyvale, CA, ranked 1848 | $0 |
|
| 3 | FIVE STAR HOME CARE LLC Sunnyvale, CA, ranked 1872 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HELENIUM HOME HEALTH INC San Jose, CA, ranked 2341 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.