Providers

PHARADJA ANDREWS

NPI 1326809963, individual, Stockton, CA, Doula

Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NamePHARADJA ANDREWS
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedJanuary 22, 2024, last updated January 22, 2024
Practice location1450 BATTLEMENT DR, Stockton, CA 95206-4514, 718-207-9786
Specialties
Doula (374J00000X, primary)

In this area

18 providers in Stockton, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $59.6M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 11 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 7.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3PROHEALTH HOME CARE, INC
Stockton, CA, ranked 1389
$71K
  • Part of provider network D1-00023, ranked 23 nationally.
3STOCKTON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
Stockton, CA, ranked 2410
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
3NOBLE CARE CENTER LLC
Stockton, CA, ranked 3556
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
3PROHEALTH HOME CARE, INC
Stockton, CA, ranked 3928
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00023, ranked 23 nationally.
3STOCKTON EDISON HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
Stockton, CA, ranked 4350
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3INTELLIHEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
Stockton, CA, ranked 5622
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3BROOKSIDE CARE CENTER LLC
Stockton, CA, ranked 6131
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
4SHIVJITINDER SIDHU
Stockton, CA, ranked 7897
$696K
  • Hours beyond a day in 11 months, but with up to 333 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
All 18 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.