JACOB STROMAN, DPT
NPI 1336527324, individual, Red Bluff, CA, Physical Therapist
- Medicaid dollars per patient on code 97110 ($1519 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | JACOB STROMAN, DPT |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | May 11, 2015, last updated May 11, 2015 |
| Practice location | 2490 S MAIN ST, Red Bluff, CA 96080-4337, 530-529-3636 |
| Specialties | Physical Therapist (225100000X, primary, license PT 42497 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97110 | Therapy procedure using exercise to develop strength, endurance, range of motion, and flexibility, each 15 minutes | $790K | 91% | $2K | $76 (top 5% from $314) | 100th percentile | |
| 97750 | Test or measurement for functional capacity, each 15 minutes | $69K | 8% | $441 | $37 (top 5% from $129) | 100th percentile | |
| 97139 | Medicaid service code | $5K | 1% | $427 | $98 (top 5% from $776) | too few months to rank |
| code | what it is | services | beneficiaries | paid | submitted per service | allowed per service | charge to allowed | usual for this code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97110 | Therapy procedure using exercise to develop strength, endurance, range of motion, and flexibility, each 15 minutes | 2,383 | 129 | $43K | $38 | $23 | 1.6x | 2.9x (90th percentile 4.8x) |
| 97112 | Therapy procedure to re-educate brain-to-nerve-to-muscle function, each 15 minutes | 742 | 79 | $18K | $36 | $30 | 1.2x | 2.5x (90th percentile 4.2x) |
| 97113 | Therapy procedure using water pool to exercises, each 15 minutes | 721 | 29 | $17K | $40 | $31 | 1.3x | 2.6x (90th percentile 4.2x) |
| 97530 | Therapy procedure using functional activities | 498 | 52 | $14K | $41 | $36 | 1.1x | 2.3x (90th percentile 3.5x) |
| 97163 | Evaluation for physical therapy, typically 45 minutes | 144 | 129 | $11K | $110 | $102 | 1.1x | 1.9x (90th percentile 2.9x) |
| 97140 | Therapy procedure using manual technique, each 15 minutes | 438 | 50 | $7K | $29 | $21 | 1.4x | 3.2x (90th percentile 5.0x) |
| G0283 | Electrical stimulation (unattended), to one or more areas for indication(s) other than wound care, as part of a therapy plan of care | 714 | 95 | $5K | $15 | $9 | 1.7x | 4.1x (90th percentile 7.2x) |
| 97012 | Application of mechanical traction | 114 | 16 | $1K | $16 | $11 | 1.4x | 3.5x (90th percentile 5.8x) |
A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.
In this area
8 providers in Tehama County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $2.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 5 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 2. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAMES OOI Corning, CA, ranked 373 | $2K |
|
| 3 | RED BLUFF HEALTH CARE, INC. Red Bluff, CA, ranked 1905 | $0 |
|
| 3 | SHASTA VIEW CARE CENTER LLC Red Bluff, CA, ranked 2426 | $0 |
|
| 4 | KERRY WAITS Red Bluff, CA, ranked 7772 | $1.3M |
|
| 5 | BRIAN LAIR Red Bluff, CA, ranked 10259 | $506K |
|
| 5 | LEE SHOOP Red Bluff, CA, ranked 10321 | $371K |
|
| 5 | JAMES MONTANA Red Bluff, CA, ranked 10356 | $261K |
|
| 5 | DANIEL LEAVITT Red Bluff, CA, ranked 11369 | $299K |
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.