Providers

KANESHKA ALAMSHAHI, md

NPI 1346510419, individual, Olivehurst, CA, Family Medicine

4
Evidence tier
structure or single-organization volume
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 1123 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
score 51 of 100, rank 9180, $556K at stake

Hours billed per day

Medicaid billing converted into hours of hands-on care per day. The lower bound counts one unit per claim line and needs no price; the other two divide dollars by a unit price, the conservative one at 1.5 times the price. The clinician on the claim may be a supervisor under state rules, so billing organizations are counted too.

monthwhat was foundhours per day, lower boundhours per day, at pricehours per day, conservativeper working daypatientsbilling organizationscodespaid
Sep 2024More hours than a day holds, even counting one unit per claim line26.05.43.65.21123299203 99213 99214$5K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameKANESHKA ALAMSHAHI, md
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedJanuary 6, 2012, last updated February 26, 2026
Practice location4941 OLIVEHURST AVE, Olivehurst, CA 95961-4225, 530-743-4611
Mailing addressPO BOX AD, Yuba City, CA 95992-1396
Specialties
Family Medicine (207Q00000X, primary, license A126729 CA)
Student in an Organized Health Care Education/Training Program (390200000X)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
T1015Medicaid service code$5.0M87%$138$182 (top 5% from $488)33rd percentile
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$508K9%$9.89$44 (top 5% from $110)11th percentile
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$94K2%$8.01$28 (top 5% from $147)21st percentile
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$58K1%$21$60 (top 5% from $133)11th percentile
99203New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$24K0%$27$67 (top 5% from $121)9th percentile
G9012Medicaid service code$18K0%$205$232 (top 5% from $425)too few months to rank
90686Influenza vaccine, quadrivalent, preservative free, 0.5 ml dosage$7K0%$4.52$2.30 (top 5% from $20)57th percentile
87635Amplifed dna or rna probe detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (covid-19) antigen$7K0%$113$44 (top 5% from $70)too few months to rank
Medicare Part B 2024, largest codes
codewhat it isservicesbeneficiariespaidsubmitted per serviceallowed per servicecharge to allowedusual for this code
81002Urinalysis, manual test7762$263$20$35.9x3.5x (90th percentile 7.6x)
82962Blood glucose (sugar) test performed by hand-held instrument3728$119$15$34.7x3.7x (90th percentile 8.1x)
83037Hemoglobin a1c level, by device for home use7458$1$0$01.0x3.2x (90th percentile 6.3x)

A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.

In this area

2 providers in Yuba County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.3M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 1 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3MELON HOLDINGS LLC
Marysville, CA, ranked 5288
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
4HARPREET JOHL
Olivehurst, CA, ranked 8884
$1.3M
  • Hours beyond a day in 10 months, but with up to 1158 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.