TAMMY DOBBIN, ACGNP
NPI 1346902830, individual, Chicago, IL, Nurse Practitioner, Gerontology
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since November 9, 2021.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 13 later months, $126,624 in total.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(4) false or misleading information and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Nov 9, 2021 | Jan 3, 2033 | 13 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | $127K | $0 |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | TAMMY DOBBIN, ACGNP |
| Type | Individual, sole proprietor |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | October 12, 2021, last updated September 6, 2022 |
| Practice location | 45 W 111TH ST, Chicago, IL 60628-4200, 773-995-3000 |
| Mailing address | 7220 W 83RD ST, Bridgeview, IL 60455-1981 |
| Specialties | Nurse Practitioner, Gerontology (363LG0600X, primary, license 209.024375 IL) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99232 | Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 35 minutes | $58K | 46% | $88 | $67 (top 5% from $174) | 69th percentile | |
| 99222 | Initial hospital care with straightforward or low-level medical decision making, if using time, at least 55 minutes | $42K | 33% | $87 | $63 (top 5% from $137) | 74th percentile | |
| 99231 | Subsequent hospital care with straightforward or low level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 25 minutes | $16K | 13% | $52 | $37 (top 5% from $103) | 70th percentile | |
| 99238 | Hospital discharge day management, 30 minutes or less | $5K | 4% | $42 | $48 (top 5% from $80) | 41st percentile | |
| 99221 | Initial hospital care with straightforward or low level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 40 minutes | $2K | 2% | $65 | $50 (top 5% from $194) | too few months to rank | |
| 99308 | Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $2K | 2% | $32 | $14 (top 5% from $58) | too few months to rank | |
| 99309 | Subsequent nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 30 minutes | $1K | 1% | $38 | $21 (top 5% from $84) | too few months to rank |
In this area
226 providers in Cook County, IL carry an indicator in the public record, with $140.7M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 112 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 92. 16 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FA 1ST SOLUTIONS Chicago, IL, ranked 21 | $43K |
|
| 1 | HISHAM SADEK Chicago, IL, ranked 51 | $2.0M |
|
| 1 | RAPID HEALTHCARE LABORATORY LLC Elgin, IL, ranked 94 | $369K |
|
| 1 | GORDON DENTAL ASSOCIATES, LTD. Olympia Fields, IL, ranked 98 | $323K |
|
| 1 | KENNETH PELEHAC Oak Lawn, IL, ranked 294 | $9K |
|
| 1 | MASTURA ZALWANGO Skokie, IL, ranked 302 | $8K |
|
| 1 | WESTERN LABS COMPANY Chicago, IL, ranked 311 | $6K |
|
| 1 | SABA OSMANI LA Grange Highlands, IL, ranked 331 | $4K |
|
Recent enforcement in IL
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.