Providers
PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
NPI 1376685297, organization, Princeton, NJ, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00122, ranked 122 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 2218, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00122 ranked 12234 providers around Hanover, PA: 9 hospices, 5 home health agencies, 20 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION (also PENN MEDICINE HOSPICE PRINCETON HEALTH) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | February 14, 2007, last updated April 13, 2023 |
| Practice location | 105 COLLEGE RD E FL 2, Princeton, NJ 08540-6622, 609-497-4900 |
| Authorized official | GUILHERME VALLADARES (Chief Financial Officer) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
5 providers in Mercer County, NJ carry an indicator in the public record, with $2.7M at stake between them. The most common is named in an enforcement record, on 2 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 2. 2 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KWENYAN AND ASSOCIATES Ewing, NJ, ranked 480 | $0 |
|
| 1 | KWENYAN AND ASSOCIATES Ewing, NJ, ranked 661 | $0 |
|
| 3 | PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION Princeton, NJ, ranked 1651 | $2K |
|
| 3 | HAMILTON AMOP, LLC Trenton, NJ, ranked 5630 | $0 |
|
| 4 | SHAHID MEER Trenton, NJ, ranked 8607 | $2.7M |
|
Recent enforcement in NJ
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJIndictedJul 29, 2026
Fraud Division Resolves Fraud Investigation of Eye Care Group Under New Corporate Enforcement Policy; Health Care Executive Charged for Alleged Fraud and Kickbacks
DiDonato allegedly conspired to defraud Medicare by billing for unnecessary and duplicative diagnostic eye tests and paid kickbacks and bribes to ophthalmologists disguised as consulting fees for patient referrals, while Campus Eye received a declination after self-disclosing and agreed to pay back $1 million to victims.
DOJIndictedJul 29, 2026
Founder And Former CEO of New Jersey Based Eye Care Group Charged with Health Care Fraud Conspiracy and Paying Illegal Kickbacks
DiDonato allegedly paid kickbacks disguised as consulting fees to ophthalmologists for patient referrals and billed Medicare approximately $3.4 million for duplicative or unnecessary diagnostic tests performed at his optometry practice and eye surgery center.
DOJChargedJul 9, 2026
Six Individuals, Including a Pharmacist and Doctor, Charged in Connection with $20 Million Healthcare Fraud and Kickback Scheme
A pharmacy owner paid cash kickbacks to a doctor, advanced practice nurses, and an office manager in exchange for medically unnecessary prescriptions for high-reimbursement medications billed to Medicare and Medicaid.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 24, 2026
Cape May County Psychiatrist Admits to 17 Felony Counts for Unlawful Controlled Substance Prescriptions Linked to Sexual Conduct, Risk of Death, and Serious Bodily Injury
A psychiatrist issued invalid prescriptions for Adderall, Vyvanse, and Xanax to 17 patients outside the usual course of professional practice, with intent to defraud and mislead the dispensing pharmacies and the insurers, government benefits programs, and other third parties who paid for the drugs, sometimes in exchange for sexual activities, images, or videos.
DOJSentencedMay 21, 2026
New Jersey Physical Therapist Sentenced to 12 Months in Prison for Health Care Fraud Scheme Targeting Amtrak
Kim, a licensed physical therapist, allowed her license and business bank accounts to be used to bill Amtrak's health care plan for claims for services that never were provided and were medically unnecessary, in return for a portion of the proceeds.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.