Providers
All 16 in CA
AHMC SETON MEDICAL CENTER LLC
NPI 1386252112, organization, Daly City, CA, General Acute Care Hospital
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00087, ranked 87 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6441, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00087 ranked 8786 providers around Eau Claire, WI: 1 hospice, 1 home health agency, 84 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | AHMC SETON MEDICAL CENTER LLC (also SETON MEDICAL CENTER, SETON MEDICAL CENTER COASTSIDE) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 17, 2020, last updated July 17, 2020 |
| Practice location | 1900 SULLIVAN AVE, Daly City, CA 94015-2200, 650-992-4000 |
| Mailing address | 55 S RAYMOND AVE STE 105, Alhambra, CA 91801-7101 |
| Authorized official | Linda Marsh (Senior Executive Vice President) |
| Specialties | General Acute Care Hospital (282N00000X, primary) |
In this area
16 providers in San Mateo County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $13.5M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 10 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 5.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE San Mateo, CA, ranked 1426 | $50K |
|
| 3 | SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE San Mateo, CA, ranked 1570 | $7K |
|
| 3 | ST JOHNS VOLUNTEERS San Mateo, CA, ranked 2801 | $0 |
|
| 3 | PACIFICA LINDA MAR INC. Pacifica, CA, ranked 2802 | $0 |
|
| 3 | SAN BRUNOIDENCE OPCO, LLC San Bruno, CA, ranked 4019 | $0 |
|
| 3 | PEAR HOLDINGS, LLC Burlingame, CA, ranked 4103 | $0 |
|
| 3 | MUSSEL ROCK HEALTHCARE, INC. Pacifica, CA, ranked 4126 | $0 |
|
| 3 | MILLBRAE CARE CENTER LLC Millbrae, CA, ranked 5544 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.