Providers

NICOLE L TSANG, D.O.

NPI 1386855120, individual, San Francisco, CA, Family Medicine

Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameNICOLE L TSANG, D.O.
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 24, 2007, last updated November 3, 2023
Practice location333 1ST ST STE A, San Francisco, CA 94105-2661, 415-840-0560
Specialties
Family Medicine (207Q00000X, primary, license 20a9479 CA)

In this area

22 providers in San Francisco, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $13.2M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 10 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 10. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1JUAN POSADA
San Francisco, CA, ranked 370
$2K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since January 27, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 10 later months, $1,835 in total.
3SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE
San Francisco, CA, ranked 1210
$339K
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
3PINE STREET SNF, LLC
San Francisco, CA, ranked 1244
$262K
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3OWEN HEALTHCARE, LLC
San Francisco, CA, ranked 1373
$82K
  • Part of provider network D1-00031, ranked 31 nationally.
3DONE HEALTH P.C.
San Francisco, CA, ranked 1989
$0
  • Charged (indicted) per a Department of Justice release dated June 13, 2024, not adjudicated.
3GOLDEN CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, LLC
San Francisco, CA, ranked 3174
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS
San Francisco, CA, ranked 3652
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
3SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE
San Francisco, CA, ranked 3967
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
All 22 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.