Providers
HARRELL NURSING HOME
NPI 1396729869, organization, Charleston, WV, Skilled Nursing Facility
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00115, ranked 115 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 2693, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00115 ranked 11579 providers around Cincinnati, OH: 10 hospices, 26 home health agencies, 43 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | HARRELL NURSING HOME (also MEADOWBROOK ACRES) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | November 30, 2005, last updated November 26, 2014 |
| Practice location | 2149 GREENBRIER ST, Charleston, WV 25311-9623, 304-344-4268 |
| Mailing address | 7265 KENWOOD RD, SUITE 300, Cincinnati, OH 45236-4400 |
| Authorized official | MICHAEL SCHARFENBERGER (Exec. Vice President) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary, license 111 WV) |
In this area
7 providers in Kanawha County, WV carry an indicator in the public record, with $4.4M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 5 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 2. 3 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAWN BLANKENSHIP Charleston, WV, ranked 289 | $0 |
|
| 1 | HUGH SMITH Charleston, WV, ranked 314 | $6K |
|
| 1 | HOLISTIC, INC Charleston, WV, ranked 557 | $0 |
|
| 4 | MOHAMAD KALOU Charleston, WV, ranked 7525 | $3.4M |
|
| 5 | NITIN SANGRAMPURKAR Charleston, WV, ranked 10478 | $72K |
|
| 5 | SAMANTHA SHAWVER Charleston, WV, ranked 11091 | $825K | |
| 5 | JENNIFER PRICE Charleston, WV, ranked 11891 | $17K |
Recent enforcement in WV
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026
Northern District of West Virginia Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown Resulting in 455 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $6.5 Billion in Alleged Fraud
Two providers reached civil settlements resolving allegations that they used pre-signed, invalid prescriptions issued outside the usual course of their professional practice to patients in West Virginia while traveling and not in close proximity to their offices, and in one case submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid during that time.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
U.S. Attorney Moore Capito Announces Fraud Conspiracy Charges Against Sober Living Home Founder and Spouse
Two individuals affiliated with a sober living recovery program allegedly conspired to falsify and submit timesheets to a testing laboratory for drug testing work not performed, and the laboratory paid the billings and obtained reimbursement from federal and state healthcare programs; separately, a sleep laboratory paid $120,000 to resolve allegations it billed Medicaid and the VA Community Health program for sleep studies and polysomnogram reports prepared and signed by unqualified, non-physician staff.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 17, 2026
Mercer County Woman Pleads Guilty to $175,731.31 Fraud Scheme Targeting Federal Veterans Health Care Benefits
Radford, an owner of Healthcare Therapy Services LLC doing business as Medical Massage Therapy, submitted false bills to CHAMPVA for massage services not rendered, stealing $175,731.31.
DOJCivil settlementMar 5, 2026
Laboratory Agrees to Pay More than $200,000 for Improper Billing to West Virginia Medicaid Program
Integra repeatedly submitted billings to the West Virginia Medicaid program for medically unnecessary testing ordered by medical providers over a two-year period, specifically improper claims for specimen validity testing that were not allowable.
DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2025
Beckley Medical Clinic and Physician Agree to Pay $152,382.70 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
Med-Surg and its owner submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid using HCPCS code Q3014 for the telehealth originating site facility fee for telehealth visits where the patient was at home, which is not payable.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.