WILLIAM G WATSON, MD
NPI 1467408328, individual, Dothan, AL, Psychiatry & Neurology, Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | WILLIAM G WATSON, MD |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | May 25, 2006, last updated September 11, 2025 |
| Practice location | 2581 MONTGOMERY HWY, Dothan, AL 36303, 334-793-1934 |
| Specialties | Psychiatry & Neurology, Neurology (2084N0400X, license 00005146 AL) Psychiatry & Neurology, Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology (2084N0402X, primary, license 5146 AL) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $255K | 100% | $2K | $44 (top 5% from $110) | too few months to rank | |
| 95816 | Measurement of brain wave activity (eeg), awake and drowsy | $0 | 0% | $0.00 | $63 (top 5% from $334) | too few months to rank |
In this area
3 providers in Houston County, AL carry an indicator in the public record, with $5.3M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 3 of them.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | SHELBY DIPILLA Dothan, AL, ranked 8111 | $3.0M |
|
| 4 | DAVID GHOSTLEY Dothan, AL, ranked 9097 | $713K |
|
| 5 | JOHN STRUNK Dothan, AL, ranked 10891 | $1.5M |
Recent enforcement in AL
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.