Providers

RESIDENTIAL HEALTHCARE OF NE PA, LLC

NPI 1487955290, organization, Moosic, PA, Hospice Care, Community Based

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00105, ranked 105 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 2864, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameRESIDENTIAL HEALTHCARE OF NE PA, LLC
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedNovember 10, 2010, last updated December 11, 2020
Practice location50 GLENMAURA NATIONAL BLVD STE 202, Moosic, PA 18507-2124, 888-923-5842
Mailing address400 NORTHPOINTE CIR STE 203, Seven Fields, PA 16046-7867
Authorized officialJUSTIN DEWITTE (President)
Specialties
Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary)

In this area

3 providers in Lackawanna County, PA carry an indicator in the public record, with $37K at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 1 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 1. 2 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1YITZCHOK KURTZER
Scranton, PA, ranked 209
$37K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list and the NY Medicaid exclusion list since September 29, 2021.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 32 later months, $36,641 in total.
1STERLING PHARMACY,INC.
Jermyn, PA, ranked 461
$0
  • Adjudicated (pleaded guilty, indicted) per a Department of Justice release dated November 18, 2024.
  • No Medicaid payments in the last 12 observed months.
3RESIDENTIAL HEALTHCARE OF NE PA, LLC
Moosic, PA, ranked 6566
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00105, ranked 105 nationally.

Recent enforcement in PA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJChargedAug 4, 2026
The Fraud Division Announces Charges Against 19 Defendants for Medicaid Home Health Aid Schemes
Nineteen defendants, including owners and employees of home care companies, home health aides, and Medicaid recipients, were charged with submitting claims for home care services that were not provided, including claims for hours when purported aides were incarcerated, hospitalized, working other jobs, or traveling overseas.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Two Doctors, Physician’s Assistant Charged With Unlawfully Distributing Controlled Substances Via Voicemail “Refill Line”
From January 2020 through March 2025 the defendants allegedly operated a voicemail refill line that allowed patients to receive refills of Schedule II controlled substance prescriptions, namely oxycodone and amphetamine, without interacting with a licensed prescriber, and submitted prescriptions in another medical professional's name to deceive pharmacies.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Scranton Woman Charged With Conspiracy To Commit Bank Fraud With Funds Derived From Federal Health Care Programs
Beaubrun is alleged to have stolen and appropriated checks intended by Entity #1 for various payees, including funds derived from Medicare and Medicaid, and endorsed them to herself, causing a loss of over $300,000.
DOJCivil settlementJun 10, 2026
Ahold Delhaize USA Inc. to Pay $40M for Allegedly Reporting Inflated Drug Prices on Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
Ahold Delhaize's in-store retail pharmacies operated prescription savings programs offering discounted prices but failed to report those discounted prices as their "usual and customary" prices on claims to Medicare Part D, Medicaid and TRICARE, causing those programs to pay inflated amounts.
DOJCivil settlementJun 10, 2026
Ahold Delhaize USA Inc. to Pay $40M for Allegedly Reporting Inflated Drug Prices on Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
Ahold Delhaize supermarket pharmacies operated prescription savings programs offering discounted prices but failed to report those discounted prices as their "usual and customary" prices on claims to Medicare Part D, Medicaid, and TRICARE, causing those programs to pay inflated amounts.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.