LINDA ADELE WARREN-WATSON, MD
NPI 1518931856, individual, Lancaster, CA, Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since October 31, 2020.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 16 later months, $828,250 in total.
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA Medicaid exclusion list ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026) | Exact NPI, name verified | Oct 31, 2020 | still open | 16 | Nov 2020 | Jun 2022 | $828K | $888K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | LINDA ADELE WARREN-WATSON, MD (also LINDA WARREN) |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | February 14, 2006, last updated January 29, 2016 |
| Practice location | 1729 WEST AVE J., Lancaster, CA 93534, 661-723-0270 |
| Specialties | Obstetrics & Gynecology (207V00000X, primary, license C400790 CA) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1015 | Medicaid service code | $2.5M | 94% | $235 | $182 (top 5% from $488) | 70th percentile | |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $118K | 4% | $28 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 25th percentile | |
| 99212 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more | $22K | 1% | $53 | $28 (top 5% from $147) | 82nd percentile | |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $8K | 0% | $199 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | too few months to rank | |
| 87491 | Detection test by nucleic acid for chlamydia trachomatis, amplified probe technique | $2K | 0% | $5.36 | $27 (top 5% from $50) | 21st percentile | |
| 87591 | Detection test by nucleic acid for neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhoeae bacteria), amplified probe technique | $2K | 0% | $5.35 | $26 (top 5% from $46) | 18th percentile | |
| 81025 | Urine pregnancy test | $1K | 0% | $1.42 | $5.49 (top 5% from $12) | 23rd percentile | |
| 87661 | Detection test by nucleic acid for trichomonas vaginalis (genital parasite), amplified probe technique | $975 | 0% | $5.21 | $25 (top 5% from $41) | 14th percentile |
In this area
399 providers in Los Angeles County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $128.8M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 347 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 36. 52 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BURBANK PREFERRED PROVIDER MEDICAL GROUP, INC Burbank, CA, ranked 17 | $67K |
|
| 1 | GOLDEN STAR LABS LLC Los Angeles, CA, ranked 32 | $41.0M |
|
| 1 | MATIAS CLINICAL LABORATORY INC Baldwin Park, CA, ranked 43 | $3.8M |
|
| 1 | HEALTHSMART PACIFIC INC Long Beach, CA, ranked 52 | $1.6M |
|
| 1 | SOHRAB MOSHIRI Woodland Hills, CA, ranked 82 | $483K |
|
| 1 | QUALITY FAMILY HOSPICE CARE INC Tarzana, CA, ranked 92 | $375K |
|
| 1 | MARATHON HOSPICE CARE INC. North Hollywood, CA, ranked 95 | $368K |
|
| 1 | SOFT TOUCH HOSPICE, INC Glendale, CA, ranked 106 | $247K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.