Providers

CAROLINA MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTE PA

NPI 1518943364, organization, Aiken, SC, Pain Medicine, Interventional Pain Medicine

5
Evidence tier
informational
score 30 of 100, rank 11817, $35K at stake

Public list actions

Medicare revocation effective April 1, 2023, barred from re-enrolling until August 9, 2026
424.535(a)(1) noncompliance (dme standards not met), DME Supplier - Physician - Rheumatology, SC

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
Medicare revocation list
424.535(a)(1) noncompliance (dme standards not met)
Exact NPI, name verifiedApr 1, 2023Aug 9, 202619May 2023Nov 2024$35K$27K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameCAROLINA MUSCULOSKELETAL INSTITUTE PA (also CAROLINA ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES PA)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedDecember 22, 2005, last updated October 28, 2025
Practice location410 UNIVERSITY PKWY STE 2600, Aiken, SC 29801-6829, 803-644-4264
Authorized officialPHILLIP SUWAN (Owner)
Specialties
Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery (213ES0103X, license 59 SC)
Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine (207LP2900X)
Pain Medicine, Interventional Pain Medicine (208VP0014X, primary)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$175K62%$28$44 (top 5% from $110)too few months to rank
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$22K8%$32$60 (top 5% from $133)too few months to rank
99307Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 10 minutes$17K6%$10$7.86 (top 5% from $34)too few months to rank
11721Removal of fingernails or toenails, 6 or more nails$15K5%$7.60$9.21 (top 5% from $30)too few months to rank
72148Mri scan of lower spinal canal without contrast$13K5%$155$102 (top 5% from $336)too few months to rank
99203New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$12K4%$52$67 (top 5% from $121)too few months to rank
20610Aspiration and/or injection of fluid from large joint$8K3%$19$40 (top 5% from $128)too few months to rank
97110Therapy procedure using exercise to develop strength, endurance, range of motion, and flexibility, each 15 minutes$6K2%$79$76 (top 5% from $314)too few months to rank

In this area

3 providers in Aiken County, SC carry an indicator in the public record, with $0 at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 3 of them.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3AUGUSTA HOME CARE SERVICES, LLC
Aiken, SC, ranked 1911
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00086, ranked 86 nationally.
3LHCG CLXVI, LLC
North Augusta, SC, ranked 4450
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00086, ranked 86 nationally.
3AUGUSTA HOME CARE SERVICES, LLC
Aiken, SC, ranked 5236
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00086, ranked 86 nationally.

Recent enforcement in SC

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Former Greenville CEO, Employees Indicted in Multi-Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
The defendants submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for individual COVID-19 tests that had actually been pooled for combined processing and manipulated test processing software, billing for tests that were virtually worthless and ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJSentencedFeb 25, 2026
Lancaster Trio Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
An excluded Medicaid provider and his wife established Transformation Services in her name to bill Medicaid for behavioral health services that were overlapping, not rendered individually, and provided by unlicensed therapists, defrauding Medicaid of nearly $250,000.
DOJIndictedNov 18, 2025
Florida Man Indicted for Health Care Fraud, Wire Fraud in Durable Medical Equipment Scheme
Weinberger, who was excluded from Medicare, allegedly concealed his ownership and control of a Medicare-enrolled durable medical equipment company through a false enrollment document and, with coconspirators, used call centers to generate doctors' orders for orthotic braces and submit approximately $6.7 million in false and fraudulent claims obtained through kickbacks and bribes, medically unnecessary, or otherwise ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJCivil judgmentJul 17, 2025
United States and the States of Georgia, Colorado, and South Carolina Obtain $114.5M in Judgments in a Sprawling Cancer Genetic Testing Lab Scheme
Premier Medical, its owner and compliance vice president paid kickbacks to Freedom Medical Labs and its marketers, who collected DNA samples from Medicaid beneficiaries in public spaces and purchased telemedicine physician orders, to bill Medicaid for medically unnecessary cancer genetic testing.
DOJIndictedJun 30, 2025
S.C. Cases Among Hundreds Announced in National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for durable medical equipment that was not delivered or authorized, and with billing the Veterans Administration for massage therapy services not rendered.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.