ANDOVER VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, LTD

NPI 1548241185, organization, Andover, OH, Skilled Nursing Facility

Evidence tier

network structure with a list link

Part of provider network D1-00083, ranked 83 nationally.

score 60 of 100, rank 6057, $0 at stake

Provider networks

D1-00083 ranked 83

79 providers around Los Angeles, CA: 5 hospices, 1 home health agency, 73 nursing facilities.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

Name	ANDOVER VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, LTD (also ANDOVER VILLAGE SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION)
Type	Organization
Status	Active
NPI issued	November 10, 2005, last updated April 11, 2014
Practice location	486 S MAIN ST, Andover, OH 44003-9602, 440-293-5416
Authorized official	MICHAEL FRANCUS (Pres, VRC, Inc Manager)
Specialties	Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary, license 6076 OH)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes

code	what it is	paid	share	per patient-month	typical	rank among providers
97112	Therapy procedure to re-educate brain-to-nerve-to-muscle function, each 15 minutes	$0	0%	$0.00	$59 (top 5% from $187)	too few months to rank

In this area

2 providers in Ashtabula County, OH carry an indicator in the public record, with $8K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 2 of them.

tier	provider	at stake	why
3	ASHTABULA REGIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES Ashtabula, OH, ranked 1561	$8K	Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
3	RAE-ANN GENEVA, INC.. Geneva, OH, ranked 6288	$0	Part of provider network D1-00127, ranked 127 nationally.

Recent enforcement in OH

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026

Ohio Dentist Agrees to Pay $500,000 to Resolve Allegations of Submitting False Claims to Medicaid

Meckler billed the Ohio Department of Medicaid for services provided by Ball, who was excluded from the Medicaid program, by listing Meckler as the rendering provider instead of Ball.

DOJSentencedJun 15, 2026

Ohio Doctor Ordered to Pay Nearly $1M for Facilitating Fraud on Medicare

A physician working as an independent contractor for a telemedicine company signed doctor's orders for durable medical equipment braces and genetic testing without meaningfully reviewing patient records or performing required in-person assessments, and those orders were used to bill Medicare more than $1,842,524.

DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2026

Trinity Hospital Agrees to Pay $1.7M to Resolve Alleged Stark Law Violations

Trinity agreed to pay $1.7 million to resolve allegations that from 2014 through 2020 it made improper financial contributions to two referring physicians through office space rental arrangements that exceeded fair market value, in violation of the Stark Law.

DOJComplaint filedFeb 20, 2026

Justice Department Sues OhioHealth for Anticompetitive Healthcare Contracts That Increase Costs for Ohio Patients

The Justice Department and Ohio Attorney General filed a civil antitrust complaint alleging OhioHealth used its market power to impose contractual restrictions that prevent insurers from offering lower-cost health plans and limit access to price information.

DOJSentencedJan 14, 2026

Ohio Doctor Sentenced to Prison for $14M Healthcare Fraud Scheme

A licensed Ohio physician employed by two Florida telemedicine companies signed pre-completed orders for durable medical equipment and cancer genetic testing, falsely affirming he had examined the patients, causing more than $14.5 million in fraudulent Medicare claims.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.