Providers
ST. FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN, INC
NPI 1548259807, organization, Fond Du Lac, WI, Skilled Nursing Facility
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00106, ranked 106 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 5625, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00106 ranked 10663 providers around Wichita, KS: 16 hospices, 16 home health agencies, 31 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ST. FRANCIS HOME OF FOND DU LAC WISCONSIN, INC |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | October 19, 2005, last updated August 23, 2018 |
| Practice location | 33 EVERETT ST, Fond Du Lac, WI 54935, 920-926-7980 |
| Authorized official | DOUGLAS TROST (CEO/Administrator) |
| Specialties | Assisted Living Facility (310400000X, license 10373 WI) Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary, license 2561 WI) |
In this area
6 providers in Fond du Lac County, WI carry an indicator in the public record, with $904K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 6 of them.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE, INC Fond DU Lac, WI, ranked 1058 | $904K |
|
| 3 | MANOR OF FOND DU LAC LLC Fond DU Lac, WI, ranked 1774 | $0 |
|
| 3 | FOND DU LAC LUTHERAN HOME, INC. Fond DU Lac, WI, ranked 3024 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CROSSROADS CARE CENTER OF FOND DU LAC LLC Fond DU Lac, WI, ranked 4244 | $0 |
|
| 3 | AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE, INC Fond DU Lac, WI, ranked 4845 | $0 |
|
| 3 | FOND DU LAC COUNTY Fond DU Lac, WI, ranked 5462 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in WI
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedJun 25, 2026
Federal Charges Announced in Multi-Million Dollar Medicaid Fraud Scheme and Prescription Drug Diversion Conspiracy; Announcement Made as Part of Justice Department’s National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Cooper submitted over $5.8 million in false claims to Wisconsin Medicaid for prenatal care coordination services that beneficiaries never received and used another person's means of identification, while Jones conspired to distribute controlled substances outside the usual course of professional practice.
DOJCivil settlementApr 17, 2026
Appleton Clinic to Pay Over $380,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations Relating to the Marketing and Use of Electric Stimulation Devices
Apple Medical Clinic and its principal caused the submission of false claims to Medicare for electrical muscle stimulation, vitamin injections, and other related services that were not medically reasonable or necessary, and marketed the Sanexas device outside its FDA clearance and contrary to coverage determinations.
DOJSentencedMar 23, 2026
Owner of Now-Closed Milwaukee Prenatal Care Coordination Company Sentenced to 60 Months’ Imprisonment for Healthcare Fraud Scheme
Jackson offered women kickbacks in exchange for their Medicaid numbers and falsely billed Wisconsin Medicaid for prenatal care coordination services, almost always at the monthly maximum, when she and her employees provided few to no covered services.
DOJCivil settlementMar 5, 2026
Waukesha Medical Equipment Company Agrees to Pay Nearly $7 Million to Resolve Allegations of False Billings to Federal Healthcare Programs
From 2019 through 2024, Kinex provided patients covered by federal programs with medical braces the patients did not need and billed Medicare, TRICARE, FEHBP, and OWCP as if the braces had been necessary, inducing patients to accept them by waiving co-pays and giving free equipment.
DOJSentencedFeb 3, 2026
Delafield Man Sentenced to 18 Months’ Imprisonment for Conspiracy to Pay Healthcare Kickbacks
Johnson paid kickbacks to companies purporting to provide marketing services in exchange for signed prescriptions and doctors' orders for durable medical equipment that his company Kestrel Medical submitted to Medicare.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.