Providers

JESSE FRANKLIN VAUGHN, FNP

NPI 1609125319, individual, Davis, CA, Nurse Practitioner, Family

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since January 11, 2014.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 2 later months, $1,159 in total.
score 93 of 100, rank 388, $1K at stake

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
CA Medicaid exclusion list
ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026)
Exact NPI, name verifiedJan 11, 2014still open2Jun 2021Jul 2021$1K$0

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameJESSE FRANKLIN VAUGHN, FNP
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedSeptember 10, 2012, last updated June 27, 2013
Practice location637 EISENHOWER ST, Davis, CA 95616-3030, 916-213-0367
Specialties
Nurse Practitioner, Family (363LF0000X, primary, license 22010 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99203New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$41736%$13$67 (top 5% from $121)too few months to rank
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$29425%$7.73$60 (top 5% from $133)too few months to rank
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more$27924%$4.57$95 (top 5% from $171)too few months to rank
96372Injection of drug or substance under skin or into muscle$756%$6.25$12 (top 5% from $49)too few months to rank
G2023Specimen collection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2) (coronavirus disease [covid-19]), any specimen source$706%$1.35$20 (top 5% from $39)too few months to rank
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$242%$1.71$44 (top 5% from $110)too few months to rank
81003Automated urinalysis test$00%$0.00$1.54 (top 5% from $4.70)too few months to rank

In this area

5 providers in Yolo County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $3.1M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 3 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 2.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3RIVER BEND HOLDINGS, LLC
West Sacramento, CA, ranked 1603
$4K
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3WEST COURT LANE HEALTHCARE, INC.
Davis, CA, ranked 2686
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
4MAUREEN MUTURI
Woodland, CA, ranked 7863
$863K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 264 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4LINDSAY CASSEY
West Sacramento, CA, ranked 8708
$2.1M
  • Hours beyond a day in 18 months, but with up to 1039 patients a month across 8 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
5MARKIE MALDONADO
Woodland, CA, ranked 11575
$131K

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.