CAMDEN-CLARK PHYSICIAN CORPORATION
NPI 1710125430, organization, Parkersburg, WV, Surgery
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oig admin enforcement record (civil settlement): camden-clark physician corporation and parkersburg cardiology associates agreed to pay $155,000 for allegedly violating the civil monetary penalties law by submitting claims for incident-to services without proper supervision | No NPI on the list; matched by name at high confidence | Aug 23, 2024 | still open | 4 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | $1.3M | $5.1M |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | CAMDEN-CLARK PHYSICIAN CORPORATION |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | February 3, 2009, last updated October 6, 2023 |
| Practice location | 604 ANN ST, Parkersburg, WV 26101-5122, 304-424-4593 |
| Authorized official | SEAN SMITH (Executive Director) |
| Specialties | Orthopaedic Surgery (207X00000X) Obstetrics & Gynecology (207V00000X) Psychiatry & Neurology, Psychiatry (2084P0800X) Surgery (208600000X, primary) |
In this area
2 providers in Wood County, WV carry an indicator in the public record, with $43K at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 2 of them. 2 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MICHAEL SHRAMOWIAT LLC Vienna, WV, ranked 202 | $43K |
|
| 1 | WILLIAM EARLEY Vienna, WV, ranked 428 | $265 |
|
Recent enforcement in WV
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.