Providers

ADVENTIST HEALTH MENDOCINO COAST

NPI 1710932157, organization, Fort Bragg, CA, Home Health

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 5425, $0 at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameADVENTIST HEALTH MENDOCINO COAST
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 24, 2006, last updated September 18, 2025
Practice location700 RIVER DR, Fort Bragg, CA 95437-5403, 707-961-4651
Mailing addressPO BOX 841941, Los Angeles, CA 90084-1941
Authorized officialJUNICE WILSON (Director)
Specialties
Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license 010000146 CA)

In this area

5 providers in Mendocino County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $34K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 4 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1BENJAMIN MEYER
Ukiah, CA, ranked 250
$19K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since April 22, 2019.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 21 later months, $18,636 in total.
3ENSIGN PLEASANTON LLC
Ukiah, CA, ranked 871
$6K
  • Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 99304 ($251 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
3ENSIGN WILLITS LLC
Willits, CA, ranked 873
$5K
  • Part of provider network D1-00041, ranked 41 nationally.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 99304 ($321 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
3WESTERN HEALTH RESOURCES
Willits, CA, ranked 1597
$5K
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
3WESTERN HEALTH RESOURCES
Willits, CA, ranked 6232
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.