Providers
All 10 in TX
APC-AMARILLO SURGICAL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
NPI 1720572415, organization, Amarillo, TX, Clinic/Center, Ambulatory Surgical
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | APC-AMARILLO SURGICAL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC (also ADVANCED SURGICAL CENTER - AMARILLO) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | June 18, 2018, last updated April 17, 2026 |
| Practice location | 1901 MEDI PARK DR STE 1, Amarillo, TX 79106-2110, 512-341-2273 |
| Mailing address | 101 W LOUIS HENNA BLVD STE 300, Austin, TX 78728-1203 |
| Authorized official | KISHA MOORE (Sr ASC Administrator) |
| Specialties | Clinic/Center, Ambulatory Surgical (261QA1903X, primary) |
In this area
10 providers in Amarillo, TX carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.1M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 5 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 4. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KELLY TURNER Amarillo, TX, ranked 16 | $89K |
|
| 3 | HIGH PLAINS SENIOR CARE, LLC Amarillo, TX, ranked 1377 | $79K |
|
| 3 | STATE OF TEXAS VETERANS LAND BOARD Amarillo, TX, ranked 2083 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HEALTHCARE OF WEST TEXAS LLC Amarillo, TX, ranked 2391 | $0 |
|
| 3 | A P HEALTH AND PALLIATIVE CARE, LLC Amarillo, TX, ranked 2966 | $0 |
|
| 4 | JAMES RUSH Amarillo, TX, ranked 8222 | $538K |
|
| 4 | CLAIRE BRADLEY Amarillo, TX, ranked 9322 | $342K |
|
| 4 | BELYNDA YARBER Amarillo, TX, ranked 9738 | $10K |
|
Recent enforcement in TX
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
Dallas medical clinic to pay $7.5 million to resolve COVID-19 testing overbilling allegations
Aymancare billed the federal government's HRSA Uninsured Program for separate evaluation and management services in addition to COVID-19 specimen collection and testing at pop-up testing sites when no such separate services were performed.
DOJConvictedAug 12, 2026
Scammer pharmacist guilty in $20 million healthcare kickback scheme
Thomas paid over $2 million in kickbacks to the owner of a Houston clinic in exchange for referrals of DOL-OWCP insured patients prescribed high-reimbursement compounded medications, which his pharmacy then billed to DOL-OWCP, receiving more than $20 million in reimbursements.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
U.S. Attorney Announces Major Health Care Fraud Cases in Western District of Texas
Charles is alleged to have received illegal kickbacks for referring patients to San Antonio area hospice companies, causing over $9 million in Medicare claims, while Dr. Duncan settled allegations of billing Medicare and TRICARE for an unapproved amniotic-based product and Trevor's Place settled allegations of submitting inflated TRICARE claims for services not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 23, 2026
Nine charged in SDTX as part of national health care fraud takedown
Nine defendants were indicted in the Southern District of Texas for operating pill mill clinics and a pharmacy that unlawfully distributed controlled substances, billing Medicaid $16 million for mental health services for minors that did not occur, and billing Medicare and TRICARE approximately $906 million for medically unnecessary amniotic wound allografts procured through kickbacks.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
Northern District of Texas Charges 13 Health Care Fraudsters for Loss Over $360 Million
Thirteen defendants in the Northern District of Texas were charged in seven cases involving more than $365 million in fraudulent billing to federally-funded programs and other insurers, including laboratory and genetic testing claims procured through kickbacks, transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments billed to TRICARE, medically unnecessary EEG testing, and hospice services never provided.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.