SHERYAR SARWAR, MD
NPI 1730426958, individual, Kokomo, IN, Family Medicine
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SHERYAR SARWAR, MD |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | January 8, 2013, last updated October 15, 2015 |
| Practice location | 138 N DIXON RD, Kokomo, IN 46901-4154, 765-236-8282 |
| Mailing address | 8840 COMMERCE PARK PL STE E, Indianapolis, IN 46268-3129 |
| Specialties | Family Medicine (207Q00000X, license 57018474 OH) Family Medicine (207Q00000X, primary, license 01075150A IN) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99600 | Medicaid service code | $909K | 48% | $981 | $458 (top 5% from $3K) | 66th percentile | |
| 99232 | Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 35 minutes | $557K | 29% | $172 | $67 (top 5% from $174) | 95th percentile | |
| 99223 | Initial hospital care with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, at least 75 minutes | $198K | 10% | $139 | $81 (top 5% from $170) | 89th percentile | |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $124K | 7% | $67 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | 58th percentile | |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $47K | 2% | $50 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 58th percentile | |
| 99233 | Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 50 minutes | $34K | 2% | $294 | $96 (top 5% from $249) | 97th percentile | |
| 99334 | Domiciliary/rest home visit established level 1 (retired 2023) | $8K | 0% | $14 | $11 (top 5% from $47) | 60th percentile | |
| 99307 | Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 10 minutes | $8K | 0% | $5.15 | $7.86 (top 5% from $34) | 31st percentile |
| code | what it is | services | beneficiaries | paid | submitted per service | allowed per service | charge to allowed | usual for this code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99232 | Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 35 minutes | 6,914 | 1,154 | $399K | $144 | $73 | 2.0x | 2.6x (90th percentile 4.3x) |
| 99223 | Initial hospital care with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, at least 75 minutes | 646 | 608 | $82K | $390 | $161 | 2.4x | 3.0x (90th percentile 5.6x) |
| 99233 | Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 50 minutes | 517 | 214 | $45K | $211 | $111 | 1.9x | 2.6x (90th percentile 4.7x) |
A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.
In this area
5 providers in Howard County, IN carry an indicator in the public record, with $24.3M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 4 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL Greentown, IN, ranked 3456 | $0 |
|
| 4 | KEVIN DUGAN Kokomo, IN, ranked 7584 | $2.8M |
|
| 4 | JOHN SCHILTZ Kokomo, IN, ranked 8291 | $10.5M |
|
| 4 | LAXESHKUMAR PATEL Kokomo, IN, ranked 8317 | $8.2M |
|
| 5 | MELODY MARLEY Kokomo, IN, ranked 9827 | $2.8M |
|
Recent enforcement in IN
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.