Providers
All 215 in CA
SIMA CORPORATE GROUP
NPI 1730730805, organization, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, Home Health
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00927 ranked 92710 providers around Montclair, CA: 4 hospices, 6 home health agencies.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SIMA CORPORATE GROUP |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | September 20, 2019, last updated September 17, 2025 |
| Practice location | 10700 JERSEY BLVD STE 300, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5130, 909-999-7091 |
| Authorized official | JESSE PULMANO (Administrator Designee) |
| Specialties | Home Health (251E00000X, primary) |
In this area
215 providers in San Bernardino County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $174.5M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 111 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 98. 3 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAGALY VELASQUEZ Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 18 | $60K |
|
| 1 | MAGALY M VELASQUEZ DDS PROFESSIONAL DENTAL CORP Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 174 | $60K |
|
| 1 | PAUL STANTON Apple Valley, CA, ranked 358 | $2K |
|
| 3 | CALSTRO HOSPICE INC. Montclair, CA, ranked 949 | $2.8M |
|
| 3 | FLOWER HOME HEALTH INC. Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 1002 | $1.5M |
|
| 3 | SUNCREST HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Chino, CA, ranked 1066 | $866K |
|
| 3 | ACES HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC Montclair, CA, ranked 1142 | $518K |
|
| 3 | VANURA HOMEHEALTH SERVICES, INC. Rancho Cucamonga, CA, ranked 1154 | $482K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.