Providers
All 64 in CA
OAKLAND HOSPICE, INC.
NPI 1730795071, organization, Gold River, CA, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00040, ranked 40 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6467, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00040 ranked 4044 providers around Greenville, SC: 5 hospices, 17 home health agencies, 22 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | OAKLAND HOSPICE, INC. (also INTERIM HEALTHCARE HOSPICE-SACRAMENTO AREA) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | September 22, 2020, last updated October 13, 2025 |
| Practice location | 2366 GOLD MEADOW WAY STE 100, Gold River, CA 95670-4471, 510-394-0280 |
| Mailing address | 1551 SAWGRASS CORPORATE PKWY STE 230, Sunrise, FL 33323-2832 |
| Authorized official | PATRICIA MCGILLAN (Associate General Counsel Complianc) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
64 providers in Sacramento County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $37.7M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 39 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 25.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | AMERICAN RIVER HOME CARE Sacramento, CA, ranked 792 | $797K |
|
| 3 | SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE Sacramento, CA, ranked 802 | $431K |
|
| 3 | ACEPTIO HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. Orangevale, CA, ranked 979 | $1.9M |
|
| 3 | PROHEALTH HOME CARE, INC Sacramento, CA, ranked 1062 | $876K |
|
| 3 | PRESTIGE HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Elk Grove, CA, ranked 1140 | $520K |
|
| 3 | RX STAFFING AND HOME CARE, INC Sacramento, CA, ranked 1440 | $42K |
|
| 3 | A PLUS HEALTHCARE, LLC Fair Oaks, CA, ranked 1505 | $17K |
|
| 3 | RANCHO SECO CARE CENTER LLC Galt, CA, ranked 1916 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.