Providers

MEDSTAR HEALTH VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION, INC.

NPI 1790899524, organization, Baltimore, MD, Home Health

3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
  • Part of provider network D1-00126, ranked 126 nationally.
score 66 of 100, rank 969, $2.1M at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameMEDSTAR HEALTH VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION, INC. (also MEDSTAR HEALTH HOME CARE)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedAugust 18, 2006, last updated January 21, 2026
Practice location5235 KING AVE FL 4, Baltimore, MD 21237-4068, 410-933-2900
Mailing address6404 IVY LN STE 110, Greenbelt, MD 20770-1416
Authorized officialTRACI ANDERSON-ARAUJO (President)
Specialties
Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license HH7068 MD)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
G0299Direct skilled nursing by RN in home health or hospice each 15 min$104K42%$53$151 (top 5% from $742)33rd percentile
G0151PT in home health or hospice setting each 15 min$92K37%$67$203 (top 5% from $565)31st percentile
G0300Direct skilled nursing by LPN in home health or hospice each 15 min$31K12%$49$133 (top 5% from $1K)37th percentile
G0152OT in home health or hospice setting each 15 min$24K10%$59$182 (top 5% from $529)21st percentile

In this area

11 providers in Baltimore County, MD carry an indicator in the public record, with $29.9M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 10 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1QOL COMMUNICATION SERVICES, LLC
Owings Mills, MD, ranked 73
$729K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since June 12, 2024.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 6 later months, $728,911 in total.
2ROXANNE FUENTES
Pikesville, MD, ranked 720
$3.0M
  • Billed more hands-on hours than a day holds in 14 months, peaking at 19.1 hour per day across 3 billing organizations.
4DEEPAK SETH
Baltimore, MD, ranked 7423
$6.1M
  • Hours beyond a day in 3 months, but with up to 1402 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4CARA BALTIMORE
Owings Mills, MD, ranked 7444
$5.2M
  • Hours beyond a day in 15 months, but with up to 2463 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4OLADIPO OLALEYE
Windsor Mill, MD, ranked 7458
$4.8M
  • Hours beyond a day in 8 months, but with up to 1553 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4JULIANA NWAKAMMA
Windsor Mill, MD, ranked 7613
$2.5M
  • Hours beyond a day in 8 months, but with up to 1184 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4EMU OHWOBETE
Rosedale, MD, ranked 7877
$784K
  • Hours beyond a day in 3 months, but with up to 588 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4SIDNEY NELSON
Pikesville, MD, ranked 8564
$3.0M
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 615 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 11 in MD

Recent enforcement in MD

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementMar 20, 2026
Health Care Management Corporation Agrees to Pay $4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
CVR knowingly submitted claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE for sclerotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and endovenous laser ablation procedures to treat chronic venous insufficiency that were not clinically indicated and were medically unnecessary between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016.
DOJCivil settlementNov 20, 2025
Diagnostic Laboratory Agrees to Pay More Than $1 Million to Settle Alleged False Claims Act Violations
GTI agreed to pay $1.635 million to resolve allegations that it submitted Medicare claims for respiratory pathogen panels that were medically unnecessary or obtained through kickbacks paid under a marketing services agreement with an infection prevention company for laboratory test referrals from long-term care facilities.
DOJSentencedNov 13, 2025
Baltimore County Woman Sentenced for Impersonating Nurses and Aggravated Identity Theft
Amponsah used stolen nursing licenses and false educational and professional histories to obtain employment as a purported licensed nurse at no less than 40 facilities in Maryland that billed health care benefit programs including Medicare and Medicaid for services she provided, earning more than $145,000 in wages.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 14, 2025
Baltimore County Woman Admits to Impersonating Nurses, Pleads Guilty to Aggravated Identity Theft
Amponsah used stolen nursing licenses and false educational and professional histories to obtain employment as a purported licensed nurse at no less than 40 facilities in Maryland, which billed health care benefit programs including Medicare and Medicaid for services she provided.
DOJCivil judgmentAug 11, 2025
United States Obtains More Than $1.4 Million Judgment Against Family Medical Practitioner for Fraudulent Billing
Akoto billed Medicare for auricular stimulation (P-Stim) devices using a code for a surgically implanted neurostimulator device, which Medicare does not reimburse as acupuncture.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.