Providers

ABBY HOME HEALTH CARE INC

NPI 1851471981, organization, Richmond, VA, Home Health

Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameABBY HOME HEALTH CARE INC (also WELCOME HOMECARE)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedOctober 16, 2006, last updated October 8, 2020
Practice location7323 BOULDER VIEW LN, Richmond, VA 23225-4953, 804-745-0054
Authorized officialRobert Moore (Eeo)
Specialties
Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license 289 VA)

In this area

6 providers in Richmond city County, VA carry an indicator in the public record, with $11.0M at stake between them. The most common is named in an enforcement record, on 3 of them, followed by paid after a public list action on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1SALMAN AKBAR
Richmond, VA, ranked 81
$484K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since July 13, 2022.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 27 later months, $484,231 in total.
3ADVANCING COMMUNITIES EVERYWHERE,LLC
North Chesterfield, VA, ranked 909
$7.8M
  • Charged (charged) per a Department of Justice release dated June 23, 2026, not adjudicated.
  • Medicaid paid $7,836,123 in the last 12 observed months.
3JAWAD BHATTI
Richmond, VA, ranked 1459
$31K
  • Charged (charged) per a Department of Justice release dated June 30, 2025, not adjudicated.
  • Medicaid paid $31,331 in the last 12 observed months.
3CRISTINA SCHASSE
Richmond, VA, ranked 4296
$0
  • Charged (charged) per a Department of Justice release dated June 30, 2025, not adjudicated.
3BRISTOL HOSPICE - RICHMOND, L.L.C.
Richmond, VA, ranked 4586
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00039, ranked 39 nationally.
4THARTA KING
Richmond, VA, ranked 8602
$2.7M
  • Hours beyond a day in 24 months, but with up to 1259 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.

Recent enforcement in VA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
U.S. Attorney’s Office announces charges against three defendants in the Eastern District of Virginia as part of national health care fraud takedown
Three defendants were charged with fraudulently billing Medicaid for mental health services that were not provided and with submitting false claims to Medicare through a straw-owned durable medical equipment company.
DOJSentencedJun 5, 2026
Medicaid service providers sentenced for false statements resulting in overbilling
Wright and Winfield instructed CCR employees to falsely claim in progress notes that children received therapeutic day treatment services from 2:00pm to 7:00pm, including providing prefilled progress note templates, resulting in overbilling to Medicaid.
DOJCivil settlementApr 27, 2026
Tri-Area Community Health Agrees to Pay $513,000 to Resolve Medicare Billing Allegations
Tri-Area Community Health billed Medicare for Annual Wellness Visits provided by pharmacists without appropriate physician supervision that were billed under the names of physicians not involved with the visits.
DOJSentencedMar 17, 2026
Six Sentenced in Healthcare Fraud Conspiracy that Stole $10 Million from Medicaid Over Six-Year Period
Six defendants conspired to submit false claims to Virginia Medicaid on behalf of 1st Adult N Pediatric Healthcare Services for nursing and personal care services that were not provided, including falsifying records and paying parents or guardians of patients for blank, signed nursing notes.
DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Victim Advisory- Divine Youth Case Updates
Divine Youth Counseling submitted more than $11 million in fraudulent Medicaid claims for Crisis Stabilization and Mobile Crisis services by falsely claiming two mental health professionals provided Team Treatment services and paid more than $470,000 in kickbacks in the form of hotel rooms for Medicaid recipients.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.