Providers
8 ROSE STREET OPERATIONS LLC
NPI 1851575047, organization, Grafton, WV, Skilled Nursing Facility
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00242 ranked 242188 providers around Albuquerque, NM: 13 hospices, 9 home health agencies, 166 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | 8 ROSE STREET OPERATIONS LLC (also ROSEWOOD CENTER) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | December 24, 2007, last updated January 31, 2024 |
| Practice location | 8 ROSE ST, Grafton, WV 26354-1678, 304-265-0095 |
| Mailing address | 101 E STATE ST, Kennett Square, PA 19348-3109 |
| Authorized official | MICHAEL BERG (Assistant Secretary) |
| Specialties | Skilled Nursing Facility (314000000X, primary, license 112 WV) |
In this area
7 providers in Grafton, WV carry an indicator in the public record, with $98K at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 4 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 3. 6 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JOSEPH JURAND Martinsburg, WV, ranked 194 | $48K |
|
| 1 | MICHAEL SHRAMOWIAT LLC Vienna, WV, ranked 202 | $43K |
|
| 1 | SHAWN BLANKENSHIP Charleston, WV, ranked 289 | $0 |
|
| 1 | HUGH SMITH Charleston, WV, ranked 314 | $6K |
|
| 1 | WILLIAM EARLEY Vienna, WV, ranked 428 | $265 |
|
| 1 | HOLISTIC, INC Charleston, WV, ranked 557 | $0 |
|
| 3 | BRIAN MCDEVITT Chapmanville, WV, ranked 1665 | $915 |
|
Recent enforcement in WV
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026
Northern District of West Virginia Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown Resulting in 455 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $6.5 Billion in Alleged Fraud
Two providers reached civil settlements resolving allegations that they used pre-signed, invalid prescriptions issued outside the usual course of their professional practice to patients in West Virginia while traveling and not in close proximity to their offices, and in one case submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid during that time.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
U.S. Attorney Moore Capito Announces Fraud Conspiracy Charges Against Sober Living Home Founder and Spouse
Two individuals affiliated with a sober living recovery program allegedly conspired to falsify and submit timesheets to a testing laboratory for drug testing work not performed, and the laboratory paid the billings and obtained reimbursement from federal and state healthcare programs; separately, a sleep laboratory paid $120,000 to resolve allegations it billed Medicaid and the VA Community Health program for sleep studies and polysomnogram reports prepared and signed by unqualified, non-physician staff.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 17, 2026
Mercer County Woman Pleads Guilty to $175,731.31 Fraud Scheme Targeting Federal Veterans Health Care Benefits
Radford, an owner of Healthcare Therapy Services LLC doing business as Medical Massage Therapy, submitted false bills to CHAMPVA for massage services not rendered, stealing $175,731.31.
DOJCivil settlementMar 5, 2026
Laboratory Agrees to Pay More than $200,000 for Improper Billing to West Virginia Medicaid Program
Integra repeatedly submitted billings to the West Virginia Medicaid program for medically unnecessary testing ordered by medical providers over a two-year period, specifically improper claims for specimen validity testing that were not allowable.
DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2025
Beckley Medical Clinic and Physician Agree to Pay $152,382.70 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
Med-Surg and its owner submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid using HCPCS code Q3014 for the telehealth originating site facility fee for telehealth visits where the patient was at home, which is not payable.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.