Providers

ROY SCHINDELHEIM, M.D.

NPI 1871579599, individual, King City, CA, Family Medicine

1
Evidence tier
documented action, then payment
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since June 21, 2022.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 2 later months, $10,910 in total.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 92551 ($20 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
score 98 of 100, rank 26, $11K at stake

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
CA Medicaid exclusion list
ca medi-cal suspended & ineligible provider list (july 2026)
Exact NPI, name verifiedJun 21, 2022still open2Nov 2024Dec 2024$11K$0

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameROY SCHINDELHEIM, M.D.
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedDecember 15, 2005, last updated July 13, 2026
Practice location210 CANAL ST, King City, CA 93930-3432, 831-385-7157
Specialties
Family Medicine (207Q00000X, primary, license C37325 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
T1015Medicaid service code$2.2M85%$210$182 (top 5% from $488)62nd percentile
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$125K5%$24$44 (top 5% from $110)20th percentile
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$72K3%$19$28 (top 5% from $147)33rd percentile
99393Medicaid service code$35K1%$85$78 (top 5% from $121)62nd percentile
92551Medicaid service code$29K1%$20$4.76 (top 5% from $18)96th percentile
99392Medicaid service code$25K1%$72$78 (top 5% from $124)41st percentile
99394Medicaid service code$21K1%$106$83 (top 5% from $128)81st percentile
87880Detection test by immunoassay with direct visual observation for streptococcus, group a (strep)$14K1%$9.26$12 (top 5% from $18)31st percentile

In this area

22 providers in Monterey County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $19.2M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 13 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 8.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3SUTTER VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION AND HOSPICE
Salinas, CA, ranked 1353
$103K
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
3MARJORAM HOLDINGS, LLC
Monterey, CA, ranked 2556
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00043, ranked 43 nationally.
3ADOBE HOME HEALTH, INC
Salinas, CA, ranked 3205
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
3KATHERINE HEALTHCARE LLC
Salinas, CA, ranked 3379
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3SALINAS COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC
Salinas, CA, ranked 3401
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00043, ranked 43 nationally.
3SALINASIDENCE OPCO, LLC
Salinas, CA, ranked 4402
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3200 LIGHTHOUSE, LLC
Pacific Grove, CA, ranked 5583
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00092, ranked 92 nationally.
3SHOMIR BANERJEE
Salinas, CA, ranked 5658
$0
  • Charged (arrested) per a state attorney general release dated January 30, 2026, not adjudicated.
All 22 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.