LADD CLAYTON ATKINS, D.O.
NPI 1912198375, individual, Tulsa, OK, Surgery
- Listed on the Medicare revocation list since October 30, 2023.
- Medicaid still paid claims in 2 later months, $10,085 in total.
- Charged (charged) per a Department of Justice release dated June 30, 2025, not adjudicated.
- Medicaid dollars per patient on code 93923 ($175 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
Public list actions
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare revocation list 424.535(a)(9) failure to report and 424.535(a)(12) other program termination (medicaid) and 424.535(a)(3) felonies | Exact NPI, name verified | Oct 30, 2023 | Aug 13, 2035 | 2 | Nov 2023 | Dec 2023 | $10K | $20K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | LADD CLAYTON ATKINS, D.O. |
| Type | Individual, sole proprietor |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | August 9, 2007, last updated February 23, 2022 |
| Practice location | 6304 E 102ND ST, Tulsa, OK 74137-7061, 918-298-8080 |
| Specialties | Specialist (174400000X, license 4362 OK) Surgery (208600000X, primary, license 4362 OK) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | $243K | 33% | $49 | $44 (top 5% from $110) | 57th percentile | |
| 80307 | Testing for presence of drug, by chemistry analyzers | $230K | 31% | $60 | $45 (top 5% from $110) | 71st percentile | |
| 93923 | Complete ultrasound study of arm and leg arteries | $147K | 20% | $175 | $46 (top 5% from $134) | 98th percentile | |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $71K | 10% | $67 | $60 (top 5% from $133) | 57th percentile | |
| 99203 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | $21K | 3% | $64 | $67 (top 5% from $121) | 45th percentile | |
| 93040 | Electrocardiogram (ecg) 1 to 3 leads with review by physician | $7K | 1% | $8.87 | $7.08 (top 5% from $37) | 67th percentile | |
| 99204 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more | $7K | 1% | $104 | $95 (top 5% from $171) | too few months to rank | |
| 62323 | Injection of substance into lower spine canal using imaging guidance | $3K | 0% | $169 | $130 (top 5% from $514) | too few months to rank |
| code | what it is | services | beneficiaries | paid | submitted per service | allowed per service | charge to allowed | usual for this code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36482 | Chemical destruction of first incompetent vein of arm or leg using imaging guidance | 33 | 17 | $38K | $2K | $1K | 1.7x | 3.0x (90th percentile 10.8x) |
| 36466 | Injection of chemical agent into multiple incompetent veins of same leg using ultrasound guidance | 28 | 16 | $26K | $3K | $1K | 2.8x | 3.1x (90th percentile 9.1x) |
| 99213 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more | 425 | 98 | $23K | $176 | $83 | 2.1x | 2.2x (90th percentile 3.8x) |
| G0483 | Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms | 73 | 70 | $18K | $400 | $242 | 1.7x | 2.6x (90th percentile 5.4x) |
| 99214 | Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more | 77 | 72 | $7K | $158 | $119 | 1.3x | 2.3x (90th percentile 3.8x) |
| 99204 | New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more | 45 | 45 | $5K | $232 | $152 | 1.5x | 2.4x (90th percentile 3.9x) |
| 93971 | Ultrasound study of one arm or leg veins with compression and maneuvers | 55 | 23 | $5K | $180 | $105 | 1.7x | 4.2x (90th percentile 11.8x) |
| 80307 | Testing for presence of drug, by chemistry analyzers | 75 | 71 | $5K | $100 | $61 | 1.6x | 3.2x (90th percentile 7.6x) |
A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.
In this area
22 providers in Tulsa County, OK carry an indicator in the public record, with $9.7M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 11 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 10. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MELISSA FIKE Owasso, OK, ranked 622 | $0 |
|
| 3 | SEASONS HOSPICE INC Tulsa, OK, ranked 2525 | $0 |
|
| 3 | TULSA HILLS COMMUNITY INC Tulsa, OK, ranked 3149 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HOSPICE OF NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA, LLC Tulsa, OK, ranked 3203 | $0 |
|
| 3 | HEALTHCARE INNOVATIONS OF OKLAHOMA, LLC Broken Arrow, OK, ranked 3910 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CONHOLD OF OWASSO LLC Owasso, OK, ranked 4471 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CARE PLUS HOME HEALTH CARE INC Tulsa, OK, ranked 4835 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CONHOLD OF SAND SPRINGS, LLC Sand Springs, OK, ranked 5378 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in OK
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.