Providers

RUPA RAVINDRA SHETTY, M.D.

NPI 1962428235, individual, Myrtle Beach, SC, Psychiatry & Neurology, Psychiatry

5
Evidence tier
informational
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 99232 ($188 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
score 35 of 100, rank 10106, $1.0M at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameRUPA RAVINDRA SHETTY, M.D.
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedJuly 13, 2006, last updated June 2, 2016
Practice location237 AVENUE OF THE PALMS, Myrtle Beach, SC 29579-1247, 843-461-6133
Specialties
Psychiatry & Neurology, Psychiatry (2084P0800X, primary, license 27604 SC)
Psychiatry & Neurology, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (2084P0804X, license 27604 SC)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99232Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 35 minutes$789K49%$188$67 (top 5% from $174)96th percentile
99223Initial hospital care with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, at least 75 minutes$253K16%$149$81 (top 5% from $170)92nd percentile
99233Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 50 minutes$235K15%$130$96 (top 5% from $249)70th percentile
99239Hospital discharge day management, more than 30 minutes$220K14%$80$49 (top 5% from $101)85th percentile
99222Initial hospital care with straightforward or low-level medical decision making, if using time, at least 55 minutes$119K7%$103$63 (top 5% from $137)84th percentile
Medicare Part B 2024, largest codes
codewhat it isservicesbeneficiariespaidsubmitted per serviceallowed per servicecharge to allowedusual for this code
99232Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 35 minutes33872$20K$125$741.7x2.6x (90th percentile 4.3x)
99233Subsequent hospital care with moderate levelof medical decision making, if using time, at least 50 minutes10760$9K$175$1111.6x2.6x (90th percentile 4.7x)
99223Initial hospital care with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, at least 75 minutes6055$8K$275$1621.7x3.0x (90th percentile 5.6x)
99239Hospital discharge day management, more than 30 minutes5554$5K$200$1071.9x2.8x (90th percentile 5.6x)
90791Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation1916$2K$215$1541.4x1.9x (90th percentile 3.6x)
99211Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of established patient that may not require presence of healthcare professional8357$1K$115$215.4x2.5x (90th percentile 4.6x)
96372Injection of drug or substance under skin or into muscle8338$551$25$131.9x3.6x (90th percentile 6.4x)

A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.

In this area

4 providers in Horry County, SC carry an indicator in the public record, with $2.8M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 3 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3LORIS REHAB AND NURSING CENTER, LLC
Loris, SC, ranked 1763
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00043, ranked 43 nationally.
5MELISSA SWARTZ
Murrells Inlet, SC, ranked 10556
$1.4M
  • 69% of Medicaid dollars are on codes with a history of abuse.
5ADEDAPO ODUWOLE
Myrtle Beach, SC, ranked 10974
$1.2M
5SUSAN HAMMOND
Conway, SC, ranked 11428
$234K

Recent enforcement in SC

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJIndictedMar 11, 2026
Former Greenville CEO, Employees Indicted in Multi-Million Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme
The defendants submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for individual COVID-19 tests that had actually been pooled for combined processing and manipulated test processing software, billing for tests that were virtually worthless and ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJSentencedFeb 25, 2026
Lancaster Trio Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
An excluded Medicaid provider and his wife established Transformation Services in her name to bill Medicaid for behavioral health services that were overlapping, not rendered individually, and provided by unlicensed therapists, defrauding Medicaid of nearly $250,000.
DOJIndictedNov 18, 2025
Florida Man Indicted for Health Care Fraud, Wire Fraud in Durable Medical Equipment Scheme
Weinberger, who was excluded from Medicare, allegedly concealed his ownership and control of a Medicare-enrolled durable medical equipment company through a false enrollment document and, with coconspirators, used call centers to generate doctors' orders for orthotic braces and submit approximately $6.7 million in false and fraudulent claims obtained through kickbacks and bribes, medically unnecessary, or otherwise ineligible for reimbursement.
DOJCivil judgmentJul 17, 2025
United States and the States of Georgia, Colorado, and South Carolina Obtain $114.5M in Judgments in a Sprawling Cancer Genetic Testing Lab Scheme
Premier Medical, its owner and compliance vice president paid kickbacks to Freedom Medical Labs and its marketers, who collected DNA samples from Medicaid beneficiaries in public spaces and purchased telemedicine physician orders, to bill Medicaid for medically unnecessary cancer genetic testing.
DOJIndictedJun 30, 2025
S.C. Cases Among Hundreds Announced in National Health Care Fraud Takedown
Two defendants were charged with submitting false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for durable medical equipment that was not delivered or authorized, and with billing the Veterans Administration for massage therapy services not rendered.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.