ALEXANDRA WARNER
NPI 1992112601, individual, Boulder, CO, Counselor, Mental Health
- 92% of Medicaid dollars are on codes with a history of abuse.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ALEXANDRA WARNER |
| Type | Individual |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | July 14, 2014, last updated July 14, 2014 |
| Practice location | 1333 IRIS AVE, Boulder, CO 80304-2226, 303-443-8500 |
| Specialties | Counselor, Mental Health (101YM0800X, primary) |
Procedures billed
The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.
| code | what it is | paid | share | per patient-month | typical | rank among providers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90837 | Psychotherapy, 1 hourhistory of abuse | $1.7M | 92% | $310 | $191 (top 5% from $442) | 85th percentile | |
| 90791 | Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation | $132K | 7% | $147 | $105 (top 5% from $228) | 82nd percentile | |
| 90834 | Psychotherapy, 45 minutes | $13K | 1% | $137 | $101 (top 5% from $318) | too few months to rank | |
| 90832 | Psychotherapy, 30 minutes | $2K | 0% | $66 | $59 (top 5% from $239) | too few months to rank |
In this area
2 providers in Boulder County, CO carry an indicator in the public record, with $2.0M at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 1 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLARO SCIENTIFIC LABORATORIES CORP Lafayette, CO, ranked 405 | $737 |
|
| 4 | LYNDSEY RYAN Longmont, CO, ranked 8136 | $2.0M |
|
Recent enforcement in CO
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.