Providers

CHATHAM HOSPITAL INC

NPI 1093712655, organization, Siler City, NC, General Acute Care Hospital, Critical Access

5
Evidence tier
informational
score 31 of 100, rank 11162, $607K at stake

Paid after the action

Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.

listidentity checkaction datewindow closedmonths paid afterfirstlastpaid after12 months before
oig admin
enforcement record (civil settlement): unc health chatham hospital agreed to pay $49,000 for allegedly violating patient dumping statute by failing to provide appropriate medical screening examination
No NPI on the list; matched by name at high confidenceMar 1, 2024still open9Apr 2024Dec 2024$607K$658K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameCHATHAM HOSPITAL INC
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedJune 28, 2005, last updated October 2, 2023
Practice location475 PROGRESS BLVD., Siler City, NC 27344, 919-799-4000
Mailing addressPO BOX 649, Siler City, NC 27344-0649
Authorized officialMichael Bunch (Cfo)
Specialties
General Acute Care Hospital, Critical Access (282NC0060X, primary, license H0007 NC)

In this area

2 providers in Chatham County, NC carry an indicator in the public record, with $301K at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 2 of them. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1PAUL TOBIN
Chapel Hill, NC, ranked 166
$68K
  • Listed on the Medicare revocation list since January 6, 2023.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 6 later months, $67,978 in total.
5CHATHAM HOSPITAL, INC.
Siler City, NC, ranked 11431
$233K

Recent enforcement in NC

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJSentencedAug 27, 2026
Charlotte Woman Sentenced for Defrauding the North Carolina Medicaid Program
Jackson and her company submitted over $1.9 million in claims to NC Medicaid for urine drug testing and psychotherapy services that were never performed or already paid, using Medicaid recipients' personal information, and she spent the proceeds.
DOJPleaded guiltyJul 9, 2026
Guilford County Woman Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud in Connection with Million Dollar Urine Drug Testing Scheme
Singleton owned and operated Joelle's Center of Hope, which submitted approximately $1,735,865 in claims to North Carolina Medicaid for urine drug tests that were not performed, listing a nurse practitioner and a doctor as ordering providers who never ordered the tests.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 24, 2026
Raleigh Man Pleads Guilty to Receiving More than $60 Million in Fraudulent Claims from Paying Kickbacks for Patient Referrals
Price owned and operated Golden Star Labs, which paid collectors on a per-specimen basis to supply bogus respiratory test samples obtained through identity theft, and billed Medi-Cal and Medicare more than $96 million in false claims, receiving more than $60 million, and he also filed a false federal income tax return.
DOJChargedJun 24, 2026
McLeansville Woman Charged With Health Care Fraud, Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown
White, the owner of Reginald Center of Turn Around, billed North Carolina Medicaid for thousands of fictitious drug tests resulting in a loss of $2.8 million.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
Felon Indicted in Multimillion Dollar Healthcare Kickback and False Documents Conspiracy
Ayyad is alleged to have solicited and received kickbacks from clinical laboratories in exchange for generating referrals, paid kickbacks to independent contractor sales reps, created dozens of sham invoices and contracts to conceal the payments, and caused the submission of fraudulent claims for laboratory testing to Medicare, HRSA, TRICARE, and other payers through labs and entities he owned and controlled.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.