CHATHAM HOSPITAL, INC.
NPI 1689967457, organization, Siler City, NC, General Acute Care Hospital, Critical Access
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oig admin enforcement record (civil settlement): unc health chatham hospital agreed to pay $49,000 for allegedly violating patient dumping statute by failing to provide appropriate medical screening examination | No NPI on the list; matched by name at high confidence | Mar 1, 2024 | still open | 9 | Apr 2024 | Dec 2024 | $233K | $288K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | CHATHAM HOSPITAL, INC. (also CHATHAM PROFESSIONAL GROUP) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | May 26, 2011, last updated January 22, 2026 |
| Practice location | 475 PROGRESS BLVD, Siler City, NC 27344-6787, 919-799-4000 |
| Mailing address | 5221 PARAMOUNT PKWY STE 420, Morrisville, NC 27560-5491 |
| Authorized official | Latonya Brown (Cfo) |
| Specialties | General Acute Care Hospital, Critical Access (282NC0060X, primary) |
In this area
2 providers in Chatham County, NC carry an indicator in the public record, with $675K at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 2 of them. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PAUL TOBIN Chapel Hill, NC, ranked 166 | $68K |
|
| 5 | CHATHAM HOSPITAL INC Siler City, NC, ranked 11162 | $607K |
Recent enforcement in NC
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.