Providers
All 94 in CA
ALLIED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS INC
NPI 1134261704, organization, Newbury Park, CA, Registered Nurse, Home Health
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00042, ranked 42 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 3722, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00042 ranked 42120 providers around Glendale, CA: 49 hospices, 65 home health agencies, 6 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ALLIED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS INC |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | February 12, 2007, last updated June 8, 2022 |
| Practice location | 869 LINDAWOOD ST, Newbury Park, CA 91320-3633, 805-496-2680 |
| Authorized official | Sivi Miguelena (Dopcs) |
| Specialties | Physical Therapist (225100000X, license pt19275 CA) Registered Nurse, Home Health (163WH0200X, primary, license 534982 CA) |
In this area
94 providers in Ventura County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $29.0M at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 79 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 13. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRIGHT WAY CARE HOSPICE, INC. Simi Valley, CA, ranked 86 | $442K |
|
| 3 | UNITED HEARTS HOSPICE HEALTH SERVICES INC Simi Valley, CA, ranked 1130 | $555K |
|
| 3 | LOS ROBLES HOMECARE SERVICES INC Thousand Oaks, CA, ranked 1289 | $180K |
|
| 3 | SUMMIT HOME HEALTH, INC Simi Valley, CA, ranked 1341 | $121K |
|
| 3 | HEARTEN HOME HEALTH, INC. Simi Valley, CA, ranked 1502 | $18K |
|
| 3 | GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME HEALTH AGENCY, INC. Simi Valley, CA, ranked 1545 | $0 |
|
| 3 | DIVINE CARE HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC. Simi Valley, CA, ranked 1634 | $2K |
|
| 3 | FLORENCE HOME HEALTH CARE Thousand Oaks, CA, ranked 1646 | $2K |
|
Recent enforcement in CA
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.