Providers
All 28 in MO
SEASONS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF MISSOURI, LLC
NPI 1215235494, organization, Saint Louis, MO, Hospice Care, Community Based
Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.
Provider networks
D1-00205 ranked 205161 providers around Sugar Land, TX: 57 hospices, 102 home health agencies, 2 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | SEASONS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF MISSOURI, LLC (also ACCENTCARE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF MISSOURI) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | March 11, 2011, last updated May 2, 2024 |
| Practice location | 3660 S GEYER RD, STE 120, Saint Louis, MO 63127-1223, 314-909-6200 |
| Mailing address | 6400 SHAFER CT, STE 700, Rosemont, IL 60018-4914 |
| Authorized official | Heather Siscel (VP Legal) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
28 providers in St. Louis County, MO carry an indicator in the public record, with $9.7M at stake between them. The most common is named in an enforcement record, on 19 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 5. 15 are tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABOVE & BEYOND HEALTH LLC Saint Louis, MO, ranked 45 | $3.5M |
|
| 1 | MOHD MALIK Saint Louis, MO, ranked 53 | $16K |
|
| 1 | PROVISION HOME CARE INC. Saint Louis, MO, ranked 56 | $1.4M |
|
| 1 | HEALING HANDS HOMECARE AND COUNSELING SERVICES LLC Saint Louis, MO, ranked 90 | $391K |
|
| 1 | PROVISION HOME CARE INC. Saint Louis, MO, ranked 138 | $122K |
|
| 1 | SONNY SAGGAR Chesterfield, MO, ranked 251 | $18K |
|
| 1 | STANLEY LIBRACH Chesterfield, MO, ranked 504 | $0 |
|
| 1 | ADVANCED GERIATRIC MANAGEMENT LLC Bridgeton, MO, ranked 566 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in MO
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Kansas Chiropractor Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud
Laser submitted claims to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City seeking payment for chiropractic services purportedly rendered on dates when patients had not visited Laser Chiropractic and received no treatment, including billing using the information of an individual who never received treatment.
DOJIndictedJul 30, 2026
Adult Day Care Provider Accused of $1.47 Million Missouri Medicaid Fraud
King submitted $1.47 million in false claims to Missouri Medicaid through Agape Love Adult Day Care LLC for services never provided, claiming 10 hours of care per day when only half that was provided and billing for patients who were absent or hospitalized.
DOJSentencedJul 21, 2026
Home Health Care Operator Sentenced for Defrauding Missouri Medicaid
Childress submitted fraudulent enrollment documents concealing her ownership of a home health care company and then billed Missouri Medicaid for home health services that were never provided.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
Federal Health Care Fraud Takedown Targets 455 Defendants and $6.5 Billion in False Claims
Four defendants were charged by complaint in the Western District of Missouri with forgery and using fraudulent nursing credentials or with false statements to receive health care payments and stealing by deceit for Medicaid claims for personal care services that were not provided.
DOJIndictedJun 3, 2026
U.S. Attorney’s Office Seeks Potential Victims in Case Against Columbia, Missouri Doctor
A federal grand jury charged Morris with issuing controlled substance prescriptions outside the usual course of professional practice and with defrauding Medicare and Missouri Medicaid by billing for services falsely representing him as the rendering provider when services were rendered by assistant physicians and by submitting claims for prescriptions not eligible for reimbursement.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.