Providers

PRIYANKA JAIN, MD

NPI 1275791881, individual, Merced, CA, Ophthalmology

4
Evidence tier
structure or single-organization volume
  • Hours beyond a day in 2 months, but with up to 506 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 92004 ($134 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
score 55 of 100, rank 7905, $634K at stake

Hours billed per day

Medicaid billing converted into hours of hands-on care per day. The lower bound counts one unit per claim line and needs no price; the other two divide dollars by a unit price, the conservative one at 1.5 times the price. The clinician on the claim may be a supervisor under state rules, so billing organizations are counted too.

monthwhat was foundhours per day, lower boundhours per day, at pricehours per day, conservativeper working daypatientsbilling organizationscodespaid
Oct 2024More hours than a day holds at a conservative unit price7.742.228.137.9506199204 99213 99214$58K
Nov 2024More hours than a day holds at a conservative unit price6.044.129.442.0392199204 99213 99214$57K

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NamePRIYANKA JAIN, MD
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 30, 2008, last updated April 24, 2023
Practice location1100 OLIVEWOOD DR, Merced, CA 95348-1210, 209-325-4149
Specialties
Ophthalmology (207W00000X, license MD.206872 LA)
Ophthalmology (207W00000X, primary, license C161938 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
92004New patient complete exam of visual system$392K19%$134$64 (top 5% from $129)96th percentile
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more$277K13%$140$95 (top 5% from $171)84th percentile
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$246K12%$116$60 (top 5% from $133)92nd percentile
92012Established patient problem focused exam of visual system$239K11%$68$39 (top 5% from $88)85th percentile
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$207K10%$83$44 (top 5% from $110)89th percentile
66984Removal of cataract with insertion of prosthetic lens$172K8%$269$332 (top 5% from $1K)35th percentile
92134Imaging of retina$126K6%$28$18 (top 5% from $37)85th percentile
92250Photography of the retina$86K4%$35$29 (top 5% from $52)66th percentile
Medicare Part B 2024, largest codes
codewhat it isservicesbeneficiariespaidsubmitted per serviceallowed per servicecharge to allowedusual for this code
J0178Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg21031$138K$2K$8242.0x1.8x (90th percentile 3.1x)
66984Removal of cataract with insertion of prosthetic lens215156$90K$1K$5412.1x3.2x (90th percentile 7.0x)
92014Established patient complete exam of visual system844618$77K$265$1312.0x1.4x (90th percentile 2.7x)
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more688485$58K$263$1302.0x2.3x (90th percentile 3.8x)
92012Established patient problem focused exam of visual system845498$54K$188$932.0x1.6x (90th percentile 2.9x)
66982Complex removal of cataract with insertion of prosthetic lens8775$50K$2K$7452.0x3.4x (90th percentile 6.7x)
92134Imaging of retina1,4771,114$42K$85$422.0x2.5x (90th percentile 4.7x)
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more417417$39K$341$1692.0x2.4x (90th percentile 3.9x)

A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.

In this area

23 providers in Merced County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $29.5M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 20 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 2. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.

tierproviderat stakewhy
1RODOLFO GARCIA
Los Banos, CA, ranked 425
$288
  • Listed on the CA Medicaid exclusion list since May 10, 2019.
  • Medicaid still paid claims in 1 later month, $288 in total.
3BRISTOL HOSPICE - CALIFORNIA, LLC
Merced, CA, ranked 1211
$338K
  • Part of provider network D1-00104, ranked 104 nationally.
3AVALON CARE CENTER-MERCED FRANCISCAN LLC
Merced, CA, ranked 4649
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00104, ranked 104 nationally.
4MIRANDA FURIE
Merced, CA, ranked 7284
$7.6M
  • Hours beyond a day in 30 months, but with up to 742 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 2 more
4ABHILASHA SHARMA
Merced, CA, ranked 7961
$423K
  • Hours beyond a day in 26 months, but with up to 4678 patients a month across 4 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
4KARTHIKEYA DEVIREDDY
Los Banos, CA, ranked 8509
$3.4M
  • Hours beyond a day in 80 months, but with up to 4201 patients a month across 4 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4GEORGE ALKHOURI
Merced, CA, ranked 8725
$2.0M
  • Hours beyond a day in 23 months, but with up to 1649 patients a month across 3 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
4ELLEN PIERNOT
Merced, CA, ranked 8971
$1.0M
  • Hours beyond a day in 46 months, but with up to 9907 patients a month across 17 billing organizations, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
All 23 in CA

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.