DIGESTIVE HEALTH PARTNERS, PA
NPI 1326037680, organization, Asheville, NC, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology
Paid after the action
Months in which Medicaid paid claims for this provider after a public action that should have triggered a screening check. This is a record of payments, not a determination that they were improper.
| list | identity check | action date | window closed | months paid after | first | last | paid after | 12 months before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oig admin enforcement record (civil settlement): digestive health partners agreed to pay $74,000 for allegedly violating the civil monetary penalties law by submitting claims for upcoded drugs and services | No NPI on the list; matched by name at high confidence | Sep 24, 2024 | still open | 3 | Oct 2024 | Dec 2024 | $45K | $239K |
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | DIGESTIVE HEALTH PARTNERS, PA (also ASHEVILLE GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES, PA) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | October 19, 2005, last updated May 28, 2026 |
| Practice location | 291 SWEETEN CREEK RD, Asheville, NC 28803-1527, 828-254-0881 |
| Authorized official | DAVID MAY (President) |
| Specialties | Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology (207RG0100X, license 40524 NC) Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology (207RG0100X, primary) |
In this area
3 providers in Buncombe County, NC carry an indicator in the public record, with $114K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 1 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 1.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | STONECREEK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC Asheville, NC, ranked 4176 | $0 |
|
| 5 | BLAIR HOLL Asheville, NC, ranked 11702 | $67K | |
| 5 | JOHN CARTER Asheville, NC, ranked 11763 | $47K |
Recent enforcement in NC
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.