Providers

BLAIR LYN HOLL, MD

NPI 1780630897, individual, Asheville, NC, Internal Medicine

5
Evidence tier
informational
score 30 of 100, rank 11702, $67K at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameBLAIR LYN HOLL, MD
TypeIndividual
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 26, 2006, last updated December 7, 2016
Practice location90 SOUTHSIDE AVE, SUITE 350, Asheville, NC 28801-4160, 828-277-4810
Specialties
Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine (207RG0300X, license 9900250 NC)
Internal Medicine (207R00000X, primary, license 9900250 NC)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99309Subsequent nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 30 minutes$216K58%$28$21 (top 5% from $84)65th percentile
99308Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more$124K33%$21$14 (top 5% from $58)68th percentile
99306Initial nursing facility care with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 50 minutes or more$31K8%$42$37 (top 5% from $100)58th percentile
99305Initial nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 35 minutes$1K0%$34$22 (top 5% from $71)too few months to rank
99310Subsequent nursing facility care with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 45 minutes$1K0%$44$30 (top 5% from $134)too few months to rank
99307Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 10 minutes$7650%$12$7.86 (top 5% from $34)too few months to rank
36415Insertion of needle into vein for collection of blood sample$510%$2.05$1.97 (top 5% from $12)too few months to rank
1123FMedicaid service code$00%$0.00$0.00 (top 5% from $0.87)0th percentile
Medicare Part B 2024, largest codes
codewhat it isservicesbeneficiariespaidsubmitted per serviceallowed per servicecharge to allowedusual for this code
99309Subsequent nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 30 minutes2,413537$186K$336$1013.3x2.0x (90th percentile 3.3x)
99306Initial nursing facility care with high level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 50 minutes or more561474$75K$612$1703.6x1.9x (90th percentile 3.1x)
99308Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more270165$14K$255$703.7x2.0x (90th percentile 3.4x)
99305Initial nursing facility care with moderate level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, at least 35 minutes2725$3K$477$1253.8x2.0x (90th percentile 3.3x)
99315Nursing facility discharge day management, 30 minutes or less3636$2K$269$763.5x2.0x (90th percentile 3.4x)

A submitted charge many times the allowed amount is common and lawful; it matters when it is far above what other providers submit for the same code.

In this area

3 providers in Buncombe County, NC carry an indicator in the public record, with $92K at stake between them. The most common is paid after a public list action, on 2 of them, followed by part of a provider network on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3STONECREEK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC
Asheville, NC, ranked 4176
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00130, ranked 130 nationally.
5JOHN CARTER
Asheville, NC, ranked 11763
$47K
5DIGESTIVE HEALTH PARTNERS, PA
Asheville, NC, ranked 11773
$45K

Recent enforcement in NC

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJSentencedAug 27, 2026
Charlotte Woman Sentenced for Defrauding the North Carolina Medicaid Program
Jackson and her company submitted over $1.9 million in claims to NC Medicaid for urine drug testing and psychotherapy services that were never performed or already paid, using Medicaid recipients' personal information, and she spent the proceeds.
DOJPleaded guiltyJul 9, 2026
Guilford County Woman Pleads Guilty to Health Care Fraud in Connection with Million Dollar Urine Drug Testing Scheme
Singleton owned and operated Joelle's Center of Hope, which submitted approximately $1,735,865 in claims to North Carolina Medicaid for urine drug tests that were not performed, listing a nurse practitioner and a doctor as ordering providers who never ordered the tests.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 24, 2026
Raleigh Man Pleads Guilty to Receiving More than $60 Million in Fraudulent Claims from Paying Kickbacks for Patient Referrals
Price owned and operated Golden Star Labs, which paid collectors on a per-specimen basis to supply bogus respiratory test samples obtained through identity theft, and billed Medi-Cal and Medicare more than $96 million in false claims, receiving more than $60 million, and he also filed a false federal income tax return.
DOJChargedJun 24, 2026
McLeansville Woman Charged With Health Care Fraud, Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown
White, the owner of Reginald Center of Turn Around, billed North Carolina Medicaid for thousands of fictitious drug tests resulting in a loss of $2.8 million.
DOJIndictedJun 24, 2026
Felon Indicted in Multimillion Dollar Healthcare Kickback and False Documents Conspiracy
Ayyad is alleged to have solicited and received kickbacks from clinical laboratories in exchange for generating referrals, paid kickbacks to independent contractor sales reps, created dozens of sham invoices and contracts to conceal the payments, and caused the submission of fraudulent claims for laboratory testing to Medicare, HRSA, TRICARE, and other payers through labs and entities he owned and controlled.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.