Providers

AMEDISYS HOSPICE, LLC

NPI 1396799474, organization, Morgantown, WV, Hospice Care, Community Based

Evidence tier
No indicators
No detector reached this NPI and it appears on none of the loaded lists.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NameAMEDISYS HOSPICE, LLC (also AMEDISYS HOSPICE CARE)
TypeOrganization
StatusActive
NPI issuedMay 21, 2006, last updated April 6, 2026
Practice location5006 MID ATLANTIC DR, Morgantown, WV 26508-4290, 304-292-4868
Mailing address3854 AMERICAN WAY STE A, Baton Rouge, LA 70816-4897
Authorized officialJOSHUA PROFFITT (President and CEO)
Specialties
Hospice, Inpatient (315D00000X, license 19 WV)
Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary, license 19 WV)

In this area

5 providers in Monongalia County, WV carry an indicator in the public record, with $1.5M at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 5 of them.

tierproviderat stakewhy
4LUCINDA MCCARTNEY
Morgantown, WV, ranked 8008
$255K
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 916 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.
  • and 1 more
5SANJAY BHARTI
Morgantown, WV, ranked 10247
$530K
  • Medicaid dollars per patient on code 99284 ($356 per patient-month) sit in the top 5% of every provider billing that code.
5TIARA DEAN
Morgantown, WV, ranked 11305
$364K
5MICHELLE CARDI
Morgantown, WV, ranked 11308
$358K
5DANIEL FARMER
Morgantown, WV, ranked 11788
$41K

Recent enforcement in WV

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJCivil settlementJun 23, 2026
Northern District of West Virginia Part of National Health Care Fraud Takedown Resulting in 455 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $6.5 Billion in Alleged Fraud
Two providers reached civil settlements resolving allegations that they used pre-signed, invalid prescriptions issued outside the usual course of their professional practice to patients in West Virginia while traveling and not in close proximity to their offices, and in one case submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid during that time.
DOJComplaint filedJun 23, 2026
U.S. Attorney Moore Capito Announces Fraud Conspiracy Charges Against Sober Living Home Founder and Spouse
Two individuals affiliated with a sober living recovery program allegedly conspired to falsify and submit timesheets to a testing laboratory for drug testing work not performed, and the laboratory paid the billings and obtained reimbursement from federal and state healthcare programs; separately, a sleep laboratory paid $120,000 to resolve allegations it billed Medicaid and the VA Community Health program for sleep studies and polysomnogram reports prepared and signed by unqualified, non-physician staff.
DOJPleaded guiltyJun 17, 2026
Mercer County Woman Pleads Guilty to $175,731.31 Fraud Scheme Targeting Federal Veterans Health Care Benefits
Radford, an owner of Healthcare Therapy Services LLC doing business as Medical Massage Therapy, submitted false bills to CHAMPVA for massage services not rendered, stealing $175,731.31.
DOJCivil settlementMar 5, 2026
Laboratory Agrees to Pay More than $200,000 for Improper Billing to West Virginia Medicaid Program
Integra repeatedly submitted billings to the West Virginia Medicaid program for medically unnecessary testing ordered by medical providers over a two-year period, specifically improper claims for specimen validity testing that were not allowable.
DOJCivil settlementApr 2, 2025
Beckley Medical Clinic and Physician Agree to Pay $152,382.70 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
Med-Surg and its owner submitted claims to Medicare and Medicaid using HCPCS code Q3014 for the telehealth originating site facility fee for telehealth visits where the patient was at home, which is not payable.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.