Providers
All 9 in MI
ANGELIC HOSPICE, LLC
NPI 1467174789, organization, Rochester, MI, Hospice Care, Community Based
3
Evidence tier
network structure with a list link
- Part of provider network D1-00045, ranked 45 nationally.
score 60 of 100, rank 6444, $0 at stake
Provider networks
D1-00045 ranked 4549 providers around Sacramento, CA: 9 hospices, 36 home health agencies, 4 nursing facilities.
National provider registry
From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.
| Name | ANGELIC HOSPICE, LLC (also HEARTHSTONE HOSPICE) |
| Type | Organization |
| Status | Active |
| NPI issued | September 13, 2022, last updated September 6, 2026 |
| Practice location | 900 W UNIVERSITY DR, SUITE A-4, Rochester, MI 48307-1817, 586-991-1529 |
| Authorized official | ANGELYTH MARINO (President) |
| Specialties | Hospice Care, Community Based (251G00000X, primary) |
In this area
9 providers in Macomb County, MI carry an indicator in the public record, with $37K at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 8 of them, followed by named in an enforcement record on 1. 1 is tier 1: documented action, then payment.
| tier | provider | at stake | why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BERNARD SHELTON Saint Clair Shores, MI, ranked 610 | $0 |
|
| 3 | BAY NURSING, INC. Romeo, MI, ranked 1448 | $37K |
|
| 3 | BAY NURSING, INC. Romeo, MI, ranked 1798 | $0 |
|
| 3 | FRANKLIN HOME HEALTH CARE LLC Sterling Heights, MI, ranked 2135 | $0 |
|
| 3 | CHOICE HOSPICE INC Warren, MI, ranked 4870 | $0 |
|
| 3 | PROACTIVE HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES LLC Shelby Township, MI, ranked 5076 | $0 |
|
| 3 | EXPERTS IN HOME HEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC Eastpointe, MI, ranked 5086 | $0 |
|
| 3 | PROACTIVE HOSPICE CARE, LLC. Shelby Township, MI, ranked 5850 | $0 |
|
Recent enforcement in MI
All releasesDepartment of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.
DOJChargedJun 23, 2026
National Health Care Fraud Enforcement Action Results in 455 Defendants Charged and Over $6.5 Billion in Intended Fraud Loss Charged
Six cases in the Eastern District of Michigan involving alleged fraudulent billing of Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers for laboratory tests, prescriptions not dispensed, and reimbursement claims for services never rendered, plus unlawful opioid prescribing and False Claims Act settlements.
DOJConvictedMay 15, 2026
Michigan Home Health Care Agency Owner Convicted of $1.6M Medicare Fraud Scheme and Kickback Conspiracy
Scott bribed a hospital discharge nurse to fax confidential Medicare patient records to her home health agency and billed Medicare for home health services using false representations that doctors had certified the patients as homebound, causing approximately $1.6 million in losses.
DOJPleaded guiltyMay 1, 2026
Pharmacy Technician Pleads Guilty to $5.6M Health Care Fraud Scheme and Illegal Distribution of Oxycodone
A pharmacy technician and a co-conspirator submitted false claims to health care benefit programs for prescription drugs that were never ordered by a doctor and never dispensed, using forged prescriptions, and he provided unlawful oxycodone prescriptions to drug traffickers for cash.
DOJSentencedNov 24, 2025
Michigan Pharmacist Sentenced to 46 Months in Prison for $4M Health Care Fraud Scheme
Fakih billed Medicare for prescription medications, such as blood thinners and lung disease inhalers, that he did not dispense at the pharmacy he owned and operated, concealing the fraud by manipulating inventory purchases and diverting proceeds for personal use.
DOJSentencedNov 21, 2025
Pharmacist and Brother Sentenced to Prison for $15M Health Care and Wire Fraud Scheme
A pharmacist and his brother, a pharmacy manager, billed Medicare, Medicaid and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for prescription medications that they did not dispense at pharmacies they owned or operated, targeting expensive medications and concealing inventory shortages from auditors.
Referral packet
The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.