Providers

PATRICIA MARIE LUTFY, M.D.

NPI 1497024061, individual, Crescent City, CA, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

5
Evidence tier
informational
score 30 of 100, rank 11565, $136K at stake

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

NamePATRICIA MARIE LUTFY, M.D.
TypeIndividual, sole proprietor
StatusActive
NPI issuedDecember 27, 2011, last updated April 14, 2016
Practice location800 E WASHINGTON BLVD, Crescent City, CA 95531-8359, 707-464-8989
Mailing address616 FM 1960 W, 230, Houston, TX 77090
Specialties
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (208100000X, primary, license 133725 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes
codewhat it ispaidshareper patient-monthtypicalrank among providers
99214Established patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$162K54%$104$60 (top 5% from $133)88th percentile
99213Established patient office or other outpatient visit with low level od decision making, if using time, 20 minutes or more$85K28%$76$44 (top 5% from $110)86th percentile
99203New patient office or other outpatient visit with low level of medical decision making, if using time, 30 minutes or more$33K11%$95$67 (top 5% from $121)84th percentile
99204New patient office or other outpatient visit with moderate level of medical decision making, if using time, 45 minutes or more$15K5%$163$95 (top 5% from $171)too few months to rank
99212Established patient office or other outpatient visit with straightforward medical decision making, if using time, 10 minutes or more$4K1%$51$28 (top 5% from $147)too few months to rank
20611Aspiration and/or injection of fluid large joint using ultrasound guidance$1K0%$96$57 (top 5% from $195)too few months to rank
99308Subsequent nursing facility care with straightforward level of medical decision making, per day, if using time, 20 minutes or more$1870%$13$14 (top 5% from $58)too few months to rank
J1100Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg$260%$1.00$0.62 (top 5% from $14)too few months to rank

In this area

2 providers in Del Norte County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $785 at stake between them. The most common is part of a provider network, on 1 of them, followed by more hours than a day holds on 1.

tierproviderat stakewhy
3SUTTER COAST HOSPITAL
Crescent City, CA, ranked 5326
$0
  • Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.
4CLINT PEARSON
Crescent City, CA, ranked 9774
$785
  • Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 938 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours.
  • Records needed.

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026
Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare
Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026
DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests
DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit
Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.
DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026
Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit
Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.