SUTTER COAST HOSPITAL

NPI 1609881499, organization, Crescent City, CA, Home Health

Evidence tier

network structure with a list link

Part of provider network D1-00071, ranked 71 nationally.

score 60 of 100, rank 5326, $0 at stake

Provider networks

D1-00071 ranked 71

74 providers around Yuba City, CA: 21 hospices, 47 home health agencies, 6 nursing facilities.

National provider registry

From the CMS NPPES Registry, refreshed daily.

Name	SUTTER COAST HOSPITAL (also SUTTER COAST HOME CARE)
Type	Organization
Status	Active
NPI issued	July 30, 2006, last updated December 6, 2021
Practice location	785 E WASHINGTON BLVD STE 14&15, Crescent City, CA 95531-8343, 707-464-8741
Mailing address	800 E WASHINGTON BLVD, Crescent City, CA 95531-8359
Authorized official	Mitch Hanna (Ceo)
Specialties	Home Health (251E00000X, primary, license 010000265 CA)

Procedures billed

The specific codes behind the dollars. Medicaid figures come from T-MSIS (2018 to 2024) and are compared with every other provider billing the same code; Medicare figures come from the 2024 physician and supplier file and compare this provider's submitted charge with what Medicare allowed, against the usual ratio for that code.

Medicaid, largest codes

code	what it is	paid	share	per patient-month	typical	rank among providers
G0300	Direct skilled nursing by LPN in home health or hospice each 15 min	$6K	100%	$533	$133 (top 5% from $1K)	too few months to rank

In this area

2 providers in Del Norte County, CA carry an indicator in the public record, with $137K at stake between them. The most common is more hours than a day holds, on 2 of them.

tier	provider	at stake	why
4	CLINT PEARSON Crescent City, CA, ranked 9774	$785	Hours beyond a day in 1 month, but with up to 938 patients a month, which points to a supervising clinician on the claims rather than one person's hours. Records needed.
5	PATRICIA LUTFY Crescent City, CA, ranked 11565	$136K

Recent enforcement in CA

All releases

Department of Justice and HHS-OIG releases for this state, newest first. Each opens in a new tab.

DOJPleaded guiltyAug 27, 2026

Anaheim Woman Pleads Guilty to Submitting More Than $2.2 Million in Fraudulent Hospice Care Claims to Medicare

Galbraith submitted approximately $2,266,694 in claims to Medicare for hospice services for beneficiaries who did not have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less, and Medicare paid her company approximately $2,140,606.

DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026

DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests

DermTech Inc. submitted claims to Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted with an unvalidated positive control range and for tests lacking sufficient patient RNA, and did not retract results or adequately refund Medicare.

DOJCivil settlementAug 26, 2026

DermTech Inc. to Pay Up to $5M to Resolve Allegations It Submitted False Claims to Medicare for Unreliable Skin Cancer Tests

DermTech Inc. billed Medicare for skin cancer tests conducted using an unvalidated positive control range and for tests with insufficient patient RNA, and did not retract the results or adequately refund Medicare.

DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026

Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit

Monogram knowingly submitted diagnosis codes in four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations.

DOJCivil settlementAug 24, 2026

Medicare Advantage Provider Monogram Health Agrees to Pay $2.4M to Settle False Claims Act Suit

Monogram Health knowingly submitted diagnosis codes within four HCCs that were not clinically accurate, not supported by medical record documentation, and/or did not require or affect patient care, inflating Medicare Advantage beneficiaries' risk scores and causing CMS to make higher capitated payments to MAOs.

Referral packet

The packet is a draft for a reviewer. It reads every public record behind this case, states what the records show with a citation for each finding, names the regulation each finding relates to, and lists the ordinary explanations to rule out first. It never asserts intent.

Ask this case

Answers come only from the evidence tables, and every sentence cites the record it used.